Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29187214›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2017

Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.

Kenneth A Barr, Carlos Martinez, Jennifer R Moran, Ah-Ram Kim, Alexandre F Ramos, John Reinitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth A BarrCommittee on Genetics, Genomics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Zoology 111, 1101 E 57th St, Chicago, 60637, Illinois, USA. kenneth.a.barr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-7053
Carlos MartinezDepartment Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University, Chicago, 60611, Illinois, USA.
Jennifer R MoranDepartment Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, Illinois, USA.
Ah-Ram KimSchool of Life Science, Handong Global University, Pohang, 37554, Gyeongbuk, South Korea.
Alexandre F RamosDepartamento de Radiologia - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo & Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP CEP, 05403-911, Brazil.
John ReinitzCommittee on Genetics, Genomics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Zoology 111, 1101 E 57th St, Chicago, 60637, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Physiological Model of Gene Regulation in DrosophilaR01OD010936 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALLESINA, STEFANO, LUDWIG, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2023
$6.3M
National Institutes of Health R01 OD010936NIH HHS R01 OD010936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModels that incorporate specific chemical mechanisms have been successful in describing the activity of Drosophila developmental enhancers as a function of underlying transcription factor binding motifs. Despite this, the minimum set of mechanisms required to reconstruct an enhancer from its constituent parts is not known. Synthetic biology offers the potential to test the sufficiency of known mechanisms to describe the activity of enhancers, as well as to uncover constraints on the number, order, and spacing of motifs.

resultsUsing a functional model and in silico compensatory evolution, we generated putative synthetic even-skipped stripe 2 enhancers with varying degrees of similarity to the natural enhancer. These elements represent the evolutionary trajectories of the natural stripe 2 enhancer towards two synthetic enhancers designed ab initio. In the first trajectory, spatially regulated expression was maintained, even after more than a third of binding sites were lost. In the second, sequences with high similarity to the natural element did not drive expression, but a highly diverged sequence about half the length of the minimal stripe 2 enhancer drove ten times greater expression. Additionally, homotypic clusters of Zelda or Stat92E motifs, but not Bicoid, drove expression in developing embryos.

conclusionsHere, we present a functional model of gene regulation to test the degree to which the known transcription factors and their interactions explain the activity of the Drosophila even-skipped stripe 2 enhancer. Initial success in the first trajectory showed that the gene regulation model explains much of the function of the stripe 2 enhancer. Cases where expression deviated from prediction indicates that undescribed factors likely act to modulate expression. We also showed that activation driven Bicoid and Hunchback is highly sensitive to spatial organization of binding motifs. In contrast, Zelda and Stat92E drive expression from simple homotypic clusters, suggesting that activation driven by these factors is less constrained. Collectively, the 40 sequences generated in this work provides a powerful training set for building future models of gene regulation.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBinding SitesComputer SimulationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSTAT Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factorsbcd protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinseve protein, Drosophilahb protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsStat92E protein, DrosophilaSTAT Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factorszld protein, DrosophilaBicoidCis-regulatory logicDicheateEven-skipped regulationGene regulatory modelsHunchbackStat92ESynthetic enhancersTransriptional controlZelda

Identifiers

PMID29187214
PMCPMC5708098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.