Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29187189›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Operational integration in primary health care: patient encounters and workflows.

Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla, Vasiliki-Eirini Chatzea, Adelais Markaki, Kyriakos Kritikos, Elena Petelos, Christos Lionis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitra Sifaki-PistollaClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Crete, Greece.
Vasiliki-Eirini ChatzeaClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Crete, Greece.
Adelais MarkakiClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Crete, Greece.
Kyriakos KritikosInstitute of Computer Science, FORTH, Vassilika Vouton, 70013, Crete, Greece.
Elena PetelosClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Crete, Greece.
Christos LionisClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Crete, Greece. lionis@galinos.uoc.gr.

Funding

National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013 MIS: 337424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite several countrywide attempts to strengthen and standardise the primary healthcare (PHC) system, Greece is still lacking a sustainable, policy-based model of integrated services. The aim of our study was to identify operational integration levels through existing patient care pathways and to recommend an alternative PHC model for optimum integration.

methodsThe study was part of a large state-funded project, which included 22 randomly selected PHC units located across two health regions of Greece. Dimensions of operational integration in PHC were selected based on the work of Kringos and colleagues. A five-point Likert-type scale, coupled with an algorithm, was used to capture and transform theoretical framework features into measurable attributes. PHC services were grouped under the main categories of chronic care, urgent/acute care, preventive care, and home care. A web-based platform was used to assess patient pathways, evaluate integration levels and propose improvement actions. Analysis relied on a comparison of actual pathways versus optimal, the latter ones having been identified through literature review.

resultsOverall integration varied among units. The majority (57%) of units corresponded to a basic level. Integration by type of PHC service ranged as follows: basic (86%) or poor (14%) for chronic care units, poor (78%) or basic (22%) for urgent/acute care units, basic (50%) for preventive care units, and partial or basic (50%) for home care units. The actual pathways across all four categories of PHC services differed from those captured in the optimum integration model. Certain similarities were observed in the operational flows between chronic care management and urgent/acute care management. Such similarities were present at the highest level of abstraction, but also in common steps along the operational flows.

conclusionsExisting patient care pathways were mapped and analysed, and recommendations for an optimum integration PHC model were made. The developed web platform, based on a strong theoretical framework, can serve as a robust integration evaluation tool. This could be a first step towards restructuring and improving PHC services within a financially restrained environment.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGreeceHome Care ServicesHumansPatient Care ManagementPatient Care PlanningPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkflowClinical pathwaysGreeceIntegrated careOperational integrationOutcomePrimary health careProcess assessment (healthcare)Quality indicators (healthcare)Structure

Identifiers

PMID29187189
PMCPMC5706391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.