Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29187176›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2017

Frequency of DEA 1 antigen in 1037 mongrel and PUREBREED dogs in ITALY.

E Carli, A Carminato, S Ravagnan, K Capello, M T Antognoni, A Miglio, T Furlanello, D Proverbio, E Spada, A Stefani and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omics Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: Literature Review and Perspectives in Transfusion Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Survey of Blood GroupsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E CarliCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy. erikarli74@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-5967
A CarminatoVeterinary Laboratory "Vetlab", via Provenza, 20 35127, Padua, Italy.
S RavagnanCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
K CapelloCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
M T AntognoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Unit of Transfusion Medicine, Via S. Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
A MiglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Unit of Transfusion Medicine, Via S. Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
T FurlanelloVeterinary laboratory "San Marco", via Sorio 114/c, 35141, Padua, Italy.
D ProverbioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine,Veterinary Transfusion Research Laboratory (REVLab), University of Milan, via Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy.
E SpadaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine,Veterinary Transfusion Research Laboratory (REVLab), University of Milan, via Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy.
A StefaniCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
F MutinelliCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
M VascellariCanine Blood Bank, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of dog erythrocyte antigen (DEA 1) in canine population is approximately 40-60%. Often data are limited to a small number of breeds and/or dogs. The aims of this study were to evaluate frequency of DEA 1 in a large population of purebred and mongrel dogs including Italian native breeds and to recognize a possible association between DEA 1 and breed, sex, and genetic and phenotypical/functional classifications of breeds. Frequencies of DEA 1 blood group collected from screened/enrolled blood donors and from healthy and sick dogs were retrospectively evaluated. The breed and the sex were recorded when available. DEA 1 blood typing was assessed by immunocromatographic test on K3EDTA blood samples. The prevalence of DEA 1 antigen was statistically related to breed, gender, Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) and genotypic grouping.

resultsSixty-two per cent dogs resulted DEA 1+ and 38% DEA 1-. DEA 1- was statistically associated with Dogo Argentino, Dobermann, German Shepherd, Boxer, Corso dogs, the molossian dogs, the FCI group 1, 2 and 3 and the genetic groups "working dogs" and "mastiff". DEA 1+ was statistically associated with Rottweiler, Briquet Griffon Vendéen, Bernese mountain dog, Golden Retriever, the hunting breeds, the FCI group 4, 6, 7 and 8 and the genetic groups "scent hounds" and "retrievers". No gender association was observed.

conclusionsData obtained by this work may be clinically useful to drive blood donor enrollment and selection among different breeds.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Group AntigensBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingDogsErythrocytesFemaleItalyMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSpecies SpecificityBlood Group AntigensDEA 1 antigenDogTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID29187176
PMCPMC5707801
OpenAlexW2770405541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.