Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29187165›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data.

Curtis T Rueden, Johannes Schindelin, Mark C Hiner, Barry E DeZonia, Alison E Walter, Ellen T Arena, Kevin W Eliceiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,379 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,379citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,379 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Management of Twig Canker and Shoot Blight of Almond Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Phenoxazine-Type Pigments fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article

2,319 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Curtis T RuedenLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Johannes SchindelinLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mark C HinerLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Barry E DeZoniaLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Alison E WalterLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ellen T ArenaLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kevin W EliceiriLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. eliceiri@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8678-670X

Funding

ImageJ as an extensible image processing frameworkRC2GM092519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELICEIRI, KEVIN WILLIAM · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
National Science Foundation 1148362NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM092519NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM092519-01Wellcome Trust 095931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImageJ is an image analysis program extensively used in the biological sciences and beyond. Due to its ease of use, recordable macro language, and extensible plug-in architecture, ImageJ enjoys contributions from non-programmers, amateur programmers, and professional developers alike. Enabling such a diversity of contributors has resulted in a large community that spans the biological and physical sciences. However, a rapidly growing user base, diverging plugin suites, and technical limitations have revealed a clear need for a concerted software engineering effort to support emerging imaging paradigms, to ensure the software's ability to handle the requirements of modern science.

resultsWe rewrote the entire ImageJ codebase, engineering a redesigned plugin mechanism intended to facilitate extensibility at every level, with the goal of creating a more powerful tool that continues to serve the existing community while addressing a wider range of scientific requirements. This next-generation ImageJ, called "ImageJ2" in places where the distinction matters, provides a host of new functionality. It separates concerns, fully decoupling the data model from the user interface. It emphasizes integration with external applications to maximize interoperability. Its robust new plugin framework allows everything from image formats, to scripting languages, to visualization to be extended by the community. The redesigned data model supports arbitrarily large, N-dimensional datasets, which are increasingly common in modern image acquisition. Despite the scope of these changes, backwards compatibility is maintained such that this new functionality can be seamlessly integrated with the classic ImageJ interface, allowing users and developers to migrate to these new methods at their own pace.

conclusionsScientific imaging benefits from open-source programs that advance new method development and deployment to a diverse audience. ImageJ has continuously evolved with this idea in mind; however, new and emerging scientific requirements have posed corresponding challenges for ImageJ's development. The described improvements provide a framework engineered for flexibility, intended to support these requirements as well as accommodate future needs. Future efforts will focus on implementing new algorithms in this framework and expanding collaborations with other popular scientific software suites.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsExtensibilityImageJImageJ2Image processingInteroperabilityN-dimensionalOpen developmentOpen sourceReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID29187165
PMCPMC5708080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.