Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186905›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Development of Cell-Specific Aptamers: Recent Advances and Insight into the Selection Procedures.

Kamal Rahimizadeh, Hadi AlShamaileh, Milena Fratini, Madhuri Chakravarthy, Michelle Stephen, Sarah Shigdar, Rakesh N Veedu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Aptamers in Envenomation Cases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamal RahimizadehCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. rahimizadeh.kamal@gmail.com.
Hadi AlShamailehCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. h.alshamaileh@murdoch.edu.au.
Milena FratiniCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. milena.fratini@murdoch.edu.au.
Madhuri ChakravarthyCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. m.chakravarthy@murdoch.edu.au.
Michelle StephenCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. mish.96@live.com.au.
Sarah ShigdarSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Geelong 3216, Australia. sarah.shigdar@deakin.edu.au.
Rakesh N VeeduCentre for comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. r.veedu@murdoch.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) is an established procedure for developing short single-stranded nucleic acid ligands called aptamers against a target of choice. This approach has also been used for developing aptamers specific to whole cells named Cell-SELEX. Aptamers selected by Cell-SELEX have the potential to act as cell specific therapeutics, cell specific markers or cell specific drug delivery and imaging agents. However, aptamer development is a laborious and time-consuming process which is often challenging due to the requirement of frequent optimization of various steps involved in Cell-SELEX procedures. This review provides an insight into various procedures for selection, aptamer enrichment, regeneration and aptamer-binding analysis, in addition to a very recent update on all aptamers selected by Cell-SELEX procedures.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBiological AssayHumansProtein BindingSELEX Aptamer TechniqueAptamers, Nucleotideaptamer enrichmentaptamersbinding assaysCell-SELEXssDNA

Identifiers

PMID29186905
PMCPMC6149766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.