Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186796›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Intuitionistic Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision-Making with Induced Aggregation Operator and Its Application to Low Carbon Supplier Selection.

Jun Liu, Xianbin Wu, Shouzhen Zeng, Tiejun Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Method for Perceiving Key Requirements of Customer Collaboration Low-Carbon Product Design.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Special Issue "Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun LiuSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
Xianbin WuJunior College, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China
Shouzhen ZengSchool of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Tiejun PanSchool of Information, Ningbo Dahongying University, Ningbo 315211, China

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is to investigate the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) method under intuitionistic linguistic (IL) environment, based on induced aggregation operators and analyze possibilities for its application in low carbon supplier selection. More specifically, a new aggregation operator, called intuitionistic linguistic weighted induced ordered weighted averaging (ILWIOWA), is introduced to facilitate the IL information. Some of its desired properties are explored. A further generalization of the ILWIOWA, called intuitionistic linguistic generalized weighted induced ordered weighted averaging (ILGWIOWA), operator is developed. Furthermore, by employing the proposed operators, a MADM approach based on intuitionistic linguistic information is presented. Finally, an illustrative example concerning low carbon supplier selection and comparative analyses are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision MakingFuzzy LogicLinguisticsinduced aggregation operatorintuitionistic linguistic setlow carbon supplier selectionmultiple attribute decision-making

Identifiers

PMID29186796
PMCPMC5750870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.