Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186593›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2018

Complex Models of Sequence Evolution Require Accurate Estimators as Exemplified with the Invariable Site Plus Gamma Model.

Lam-Tung Nguyen, Arndt von Haeseler, Bui Quang Minh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lam-Tung NguyenCenter for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Campus Vienna Biocenter 5, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
Arndt von HaeselerCenter for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Campus Vienna Biocenter 5, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
Bui Quang MinhCenter for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Campus Vienna Biocenter 5, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invariable site plus $\Gamma$ model (I$+\Gamma)$ is widely used to model rate heterogeneity among alignment sites in maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. The proof that the I$+$ continuous $\Gamma$ model is identifiable (model parameters can be inferred correctly given enough data) has increased the creditability of its application to phylogeny reconstruction. However, most phylogenetic software implement the I$+$ discrete $\Gamma$ model, whose identifiability is likely but unproven. How well the parameters of the I$+$ discrete $\Gamma$ model are estimated is still disputed. Especially the correlation between the fraction of invariable sites and the fractions of sites with a slow evolutionary rate is discussed as being problematic. We show that optimization heuristics as implemented in frequently used phylogenetic software (PhyML, RAxML, IQ-TREE, and MrBayes) cannot always reliably estimate the shape parameter, the proportion of invariable sites, and the tree length. Here, we propose an improved optimization heuristic that accurately estimates the three parameters. While research efforts mainly focus on tree search methods, our results signify the equal importance of verifying and developing effective estimation methods for complex models of sequence evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSoftwareClassificationPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID29186593
PMCPMC6204645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.