Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186562›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2019

Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Diabetes Management Intervention for Delivery in Community Settings: Findings From a Pilot Randomized Effectiveness Trial.

Deborah A Ellis, April Idalski Carcone, Sylvie Naar-King, Dixy Rajkumar, Gloria Palmisano, Kathleen Moltz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. An RCT of a family intervention for adolescents living with type 1 diabetes: Who benefits most?Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Primer on Mixed Methods for Pediatric Researchers.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deborah A EllisDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
April Idalski CarconeDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
Sylvie Naar-KingCenter for Translational Behavioral Research, Florida State University.
Dixy RajkumarDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
Gloria PalmisanoCommunity Health Access and Social Services Center.
Kathleen MoltzProMedica Children's Hospital.

Funding

Translating Home-Based Interventions for Adolescents with Poorly Controlled T1DR34DK102091 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIS, DEBORAH A. · 2014 to 2015
$411k
NIDDK NIH HHS R34 DK102091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To adapt an evidence-based intervention targeting diabetes management in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes for use in a community setting by community health workers (CHWs) and to conduct pilot testing of the new intervention, REACH for Control (RFC). The study was conducted as a collaboration between university researchers and a federally qualified health center. Methods In a pilot effectiveness trial, feasibility and acceptability of RFC were evaluated based on participant enrollment, treatment dose, and consumer satisfaction. RFC effects on adolescent adherence, health outcomes, and quality of life were also assessed. The trial used a parallel group design. Families were randomized to 6 months of RFC plus standard medical care (n = 26) or standard care (SC) only (n = 24). Data were collected at baseline and 7-month posttest. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze data. Results: Qualitative analyses suggested that caregivers viewed RFC and delivery of a home-based intervention by CHWs positively. Furthermore, adolescents who received RFC had statistically significant (p = .05) and clinically meaningful improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (0.7%) and reported significant improvements in quality of life from baseline to follow-up (p = .001). No significant changes were found for adolescents in standard medical care. However, while dose of primary intervention session delivered was acceptable, dose of follow-up sessions used for skills practice was low. Conclusions: Results provide preliminary support for RFC's acceptability and effectiveness to improve health status and quality of life when used in community settings serving high-risk, low-income families. Additional testing in a full-scale effectiveness trial appears warranted.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMalePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsPovertyBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29186562
PMCPMC6319444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.