Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186423›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

Improving amphibian genomic resources: a multitissue reference transcriptome of an iconic invader.

Mark F Richardson, Fernando Sequeira, Daniel Selechnik, Miguel Carneiro, Marcelo Vallinoto, Jack G Reid, Andrea J West, Michael R Crossland, Richard Shine, Lee A Rollins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The physiology of movement.Movement ecology · 2020
    Review
  6. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark F RichardsonDeakin University, Bioinformatics Core Research Group, 75 Pigdons Road, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Fernando SequeiraCIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.
Daniel SelechnikSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Miguel CarneiroCIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.
Marcelo VallinotoLaboratório de Evolução (LEVO), Instituto de Estudos Costeiros (IECOS), Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus de Bragança, Pará, Brasil.
Jack G ReidDeakin University, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology (Waurn Ponds Campus), 75 Pigdons Road, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Andrea J WestDeakin University, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology (Waurn Ponds Campus), 75 Pigdons Road, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Michael R CrosslandSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Richard ShineSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Lee A RollinsDeakin University, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology (Waurn Ponds Campus), 75 Pigdons Road, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Deakin University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cane toads (Rhinella marina) are an iconic invasive species introduced to 4 continents and well utilized for studies of rapid evolution in introduced environments. Despite the long introduction history of this species, its profound ecological impacts, and its utility for demonstrating evolutionary principles, genetic information is sparse. Here we produce a de novo transcriptome spanning multiple tissues and life stages to enable investigation of the genetic basis of previously identified rapid phenotypic change over the introduced range. Findings: Using approximately 1.9 billion reads from developing tadpoles and 6 adult tissue-specific cDNA libraries, as well as a transcriptome assembly pipeline encompassing 100 separate de novo assemblies, we constructed 62 202 transcripts, of which we functionally annotated ∼50%. Our transcriptome assembly exhibits 90% full-length completeness of the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs data set. Robust assembly metrics and comparisons with several available anuran transcriptomes and genomes indicate that our cane toad assembly is one of the most complete anuran genomic resources available. Conclusions: This comprehensive anuran transcriptome will provide a valuable resource for investigation of genes under selection during invasion in cane toads, but will also greatly expand our general knowledge of anuran genomes, which are underrepresented in the literature. The data set is publically available in NCBI and GigaDB to serve as a resource for other researchers.

Indexed as

GenomeIntroduced SpeciesTranscriptomeAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBenchmarkingBufonidaeChromosome MappingFemaleGene LibraryGene OntologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLife Cycle StagesMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNAamphibiananuranBufo marinuscane toadde novo assemblyinvasive speciesRhinella marinaRNA-Seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29186423
PMCPMC5765561
OpenAlexW2769341064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.