ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Global proteomics profiling improves drug sensitivity prediction: results from a multi-omics, pan-cancer modeling approach.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using proteomics to advance the search for potential biomarkers for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Protein Signature Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab in HER2-Negative Breast Cancers.JCO precision oncology · 2021Trial
- BOGO: A Proteome-Wide Gene Overexpression Platform for Discovering Rational Cancer Combination Therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping the proteogenomic landscape enables prediction of drug response in acute myeloid leukemia.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Methods for multi-omic data integration in cancer research.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- MMCL-CDR: enhancing cancer drug response prediction with multi-omics and morphology images contrastive representation learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Systems Biology in Cancer Diagnosis Integrating Omics Technologies and Artificial Intelligence to Support Physician Decision Making.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- The proteomic landscape of soft tissue sarcomas.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Transforming Diagnosis and Therapeutics Using Cancer Genomics.Cancer treatment and research · 2023Article
- IGPred-HDnet: Prediction of Immunoglobulin Proteins Using Graphical Features and the Hierarchal Deep Learning-Based Approach.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Deep learning and multi-omics approach to predict drug responses in cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Tissue-specific identification of multi-omics features for pan-cancer drug response prediction.iScience · 2022Article
- Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML.Clinical proteomics · 2022Article
- Application of informatics in cancer research and clinical practice: Opportunities and challenges.Cancer innovation · 2022Review
- Integrative multi-omics and drug response profiling of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles for Immunogenic Chemotherapy of Leukemia and T-Cell Lymphoma.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Mutational analysis and protein profiling predict drug sensitivity in multiple myeloma cell lines.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Machine learning analyses of antibody somatic mutations predict immunoglobulin light chain toxicity.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Impact of between-tissue differences on pan-cancer predictions of drug sensitivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Proteomics profiling is increasingly being used for molecular stratification of cancer patients and cell-line panels. However, systematic assessment of the predictive power of large-scale proteomic technologies across various drug classes and cancer types is currently lacking. To that end, we carried out the first pan-cancer, multi-omics comparative analysis of the relative performance of two proteomic technologies, targeted reverse phase protein array (RPPA) and global mass spectrometry (MS), in terms of their accuracy for predicting the sensitivity of cancer cells to both cytotoxic chemotherapeutics and molecularly targeted anticancer compounds. Results: Our results in two cell-line panels demonstrate how MS profiling improves drug response predictions beyond that of the RPPA or the other omics profiles when used alone. However, frequent missing MS data values complicate its use in predictive modeling and required additional filtering, such as focusing on completely measured or known oncoproteins, to obtain maximal predictive performance. Rather strikingly, the two proteomics profiles provided complementary predictive signal both for the cytotoxic and targeted compounds. Further, information about the cellular-abundance of primary target proteins was found critical for predicting the response of targeted compounds, although the non-target features also contributed significantly to the predictive power. The clinical relevance of the selected protein markers was confirmed in cancer patient data. These results provide novel insights into the relative performance and optimal use of the widely applied proteomic technologies, MS and RPPA, which should prove useful in translational applications, such as defining the best combination of omics technologies and marker panels for understanding and predicting drug sensitivities in cancer patients. Availability and implementation: Processed datasets, R as well as Matlab implementations of the methods are available at https://github.com/mehr-een/bemkl-rbps. Contact: mehreen.ali@helsinki.fi or tero.aittokallio@fimm.fi. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.