Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186328›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Meta-analytic principal component analysis in integrative omics application.

SungHwan Kim, Dongwan Kang, Zhiguang Huo, Yongseok Park, George C Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

SungHwan KimDepartment of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, South Korea.
Dongwan KangGenomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Zhiguang HuoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Yongseok ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
George C TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Funding

Power calculation and design issues in next-generation sequencingR01CA190766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TSENG, GEORGE C. · 2015 to 2018
$876k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: With the prevalent usage of microarray and massively parallel sequencing, numerous high-throughput omics datasets have become available in the public domain. Integrating abundant information among omics datasets is critical to elucidate biological mechanisms. Due to the high-dimensional nature of the data, methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) have been widely applied, aiming at effective dimension reduction and exploratory visualization. Results: In this article, we combine multiple omics datasets of identical or similar biological hypothesis and introduce two variations of meta-analytic framework of PCA, namely MetaPCA. Regularization is further incorporated to facilitate sparse feature selection in MetaPCA. We apply MetaPCA and sparse MetaPCA to simulations, three transcriptomic meta-analysis studies in yeast cell cycle, prostate cancer, mouse metabolism and a TCGA pan-cancer methylation study. The result shows improved accuracy, robustness and exploratory visualization of the proposed framework. Availability and implementation: An R package MetaPCA is available online. (http://tsenglab.biostat.pitt.edu/software.htm). Contact: ctseng@pitt.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicSoftwareAnimalsDNA MethylationGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiceNeoplasmsPrincipal Component AnalysisYeasts

Identifiers

PMID29186328
PMCPMC5905607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.