Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186281›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2017

EU/US/CTAD Task Force: Lessons Learned from Recent and Current Alzheimer's Prevention Trials.

P Aisen, J Touchon, R Amariglio, S Andrieu, R Bateman, J Breitner, M Donohue, B Dunn, R Doody, N Fox and 14 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic disorder in Alzheimer's disease.Metabolic brain disease · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Telomere Attrition in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

P AisenPPaul Aisen, Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (ATRI), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA, paisen@usc.edu.
J Touchon
R Amariglio
S Andrieu
R Bateman
J Breitner
M Donohue
B Dunn
R Doody
N Fox
S Gauthier
M Grundman
S Hendrix
C Ho
M Isaac
R Raman
P Rosenberg
R Schindler
L Schneider
R Sperling
P Tariot
K Welsh-Bohmer
M Weiner
B Vellas

Funding

Trial-Ready Cohort for Preclinical/Prodromal Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG053798 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AISEN, PAUL S., CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2017 to 2022
$39.4M
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network Trials Unit - Adaptive Prevention TrialR01AG046179 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2014 to 2019
$26.6M
Mentoring Imaging Research in Early ADK24AG035007 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SPERLING, REISA A. · 2010 to 2020
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG035007NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046179NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At a meeting of the EU/US/Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease (CTAD) Task Force in December 2016, an international group of investigators from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies reviewed lessons learned from ongoing and planned prevention trials, which will help guide future clinical trials of AD treatments, particularly in the pre-clinical space. The Task Force discussed challenges that need to be addressed across all aspects of clinical trials, calling for innovation in recruitment and retention, infrastructure development, and the selection of outcome measures. While cognitive change provides a marker of disease progression across the disease continuum, there remains a need to identify the optimal assessment tools that provide clinically meaningful endpoints. Patient- and informant-reported assessments of cognition and function may be useful but present additional challenges. Imaging and other biomarkers are also essential to maximize the efficiency of and the information learned from clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAdvisory CommitteesAlzheimer DiseaseEuropean UnionHumansNootropic AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CareUnited StatesNootropic AgentsAlzheimer’s diseaseclinical trialscognitive compositescognitive outcome measuresinformant-reported outcome measuresmild behavioral impairmentmolecular imagingpatient-reported outcome measuressecondary prevention trials

Identifiers

PMID29186281
PMCPMC5724787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.