Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186246›Full record

SynthesisAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions of Chinese inpatients: a meta-analysis.

Qiancheng Deng, Xia Fang, Qinghai Zeng, Jianyun Lu, Chen Jing, Jinhua Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. [Analysis of the clinical features and prognostic influencing factors of toxic epidermal necrolysis].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiancheng DengDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Xia FangDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Qinghai ZengDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Jianyun LuDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Chen JingDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Jinhua HuangDepartment of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University - Changsha, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions is low, and these reactions can result in death or disability. An evidence-based epidemiological study of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions in China has not been reported.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze epidemiology and characteristics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions of Chinese inpatients during the recent 15 years with meta-analysis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed Chinese literature reporting severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions and collecting data from 2000 to 2015, which were in accordance with our inclusion criteria. All included data were analyzed with the Launch Open Meta-Analyst software.

resultsTwenty-five articles involving 928 cases with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions were included. Men to women ratio was 1.14:1. Twenty-one per cent of the patients had drug allergy history. Antibiotics (26.0%), sedative hypnotics and anticonvulsants (21.6%), and antipyretic analgesics (17.1%) were the most common causative drugs. The most frequent clinical subtype was Stevens-Johnson syndrome (50.1%), followed by toxic epidermal necrolysis (25.4%), exfoliative dermatitis (21.0%) and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (1.6%). In addition to skin rashes, patients with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions suffered mostly from fever (73%), and blood routine abnormality (66.7%). STUDY LIMITATIONS: This meta-analysis is limited by its retrospective design and by its methodological variation.

conclusionThe most common causative drugs were antibiotics and sedative hypnotics and anticonvulsants. Stevens-Johnson syndrome was the most frequent clinical subtype of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. In addition to skin rashes, patients with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions suffered mostly from fever, mucosal lesion, and hematologic abnormalities.

Indexed as

ChinaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleRetrospective StudiesSkin Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29186246
PMCPMC5514574
OpenAlexW2737442601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.