Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186202›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Enhanced cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in electrospun PLGA/hydroxyapatite nanofibre scaffolds incorporated with graphene oxide.

Chuan Fu, Haotian Bai, Jiaqi Zhu, Zhihao Niu, Yu Wang, Jianan Li, Xiaoyu Yang, Yunshen Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in electrical stimulation for wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Potential Biomedical Limitations of Graphene Nanomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chuan FuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Haotian BaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Jiaqi ZhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Zhihao NiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Third Center Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Yu WangKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Jianan LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Xiaoyu YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Yunshen BaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-1983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the goals of bone tissue engineering is to mimic native ECM in architecture and function, creating scaffolds with excellent biocompatibility, osteoinductive ability and mechanical properties. The aim of this study was to fabricate nanofibrous matrices by electrospinning a blend of poly (L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), hydroxyapatite (HA), and grapheme oxide (GO) as a favourable platform for bone tissue engineering. The morphology, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and biological activity of all nanofibrous matrices were compared. The data indicate that the hydrophilicity and protein adsorption rate of the fabricated matrices were significantly increased by blending with a small amount of HA and GO. Furthermore, GO significantly boosted the tensile strength of the nanofibrous matrices, and the PLGA/GO/HA nanofibrous matrices can serve as mechanically stable scaffolds for cell growth. For further test in vitro, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on the PLGA/HA/GO nanofbrous matrices to observe various cellular activities and cell mineralization. The results indicated that the PLGA/GO/HA nanofibrous matrices significantly enhanced adhesion, and proliferation in MCET3-E1 cells and functionally promoted alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, the osteogenesis-related gene expression and mineral deposition. Therefore, the PLGA/HA/GO composite nanofibres are excellent and versatile scaffolds for applications in bone tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationDurapatiteLactic AcidNanofibersPolyglycolic AcidTissue Scaffolds3T3 CellsAdsorptionAnimalsGraphiteMiceOsteogenesisPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerTensile StrengthDurapatiteGraphiteLactic AcidPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID29186202
PMCPMC5706732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.