Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29186159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Predictors of seasonal influenza vaccination among older adults in Thailand.

Prabda Praphasiri, Darunee Ditsungnoen, Supakit Sirilak, Jarawee Rattanayot, Peera Areerat, Fatimah S Dawood, Kim A Lindblade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prabda PraphasiriInfluenza program, Thailand MOPH-US CDC Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-9869
Darunee DitsungnoenInfluenza program, Thailand MOPH-US CDC Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Supakit SirilakTechnical Health Office, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jarawee RattanayotNational Health Security Office, Bangkok, Thailand.
Peera AreeratNakhon Phanom Provincial Health Office, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
Fatimah S DawoodInfluenza Division, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Kim A LindbladeInfluenza program, Thailand MOPH-US CDC Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U01 GH000152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn advance of a large influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) cohort study among older adults in Thailand, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional survey to measure vaccine coverage and identify factors associated with influenza vaccination among older Thai adults that could bias measures of vaccine effectiveness.

methodWe selected adults ≥65 years using a two-stage, stratified, cluster sampling design. Functional status was assessed using the 10-point Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES); scores ≥3 indicated vulnerability. Questions about attitudes towards vaccination were based on the Health Belief Model. The distance between participants' households and the nearest vaccination clinic was calculated. Vaccination status was determined using national influenza vaccination registry. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using log-binomial multivariable models accounting for the sampling design.

resultWe enrolled 581 participants, of whom 60% were female, median age was 72 years, 41% had at least one chronic underlying illness, 24% met the criteria for vulnerable, and 23% did not leave the house on a daily basis. Influenza vaccination rate was 34%. In multivariable models, no variable related to functional status was associated with vaccination. The strongest predictors of vaccination were distance to the nearest vaccination center (PR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7-5.1 for participants in the closest quartile compared to the furthest), and high levels of a perception of benefits of influenza vaccination (PR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.6) and cues to action (PR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-5.1).

conclusionDistance to vaccination clinics should be considered in analyses of influenza VE studies in Thailand. Strategies that emphasize benefits of vaccination and encourage physicians to recommend annual influenza vaccination could improve influenza vaccine uptake among older Thai adults. Outreach to more distant and less mobile older adults may also be required to improve influenza vaccination coverage.

Indexed as

SeasonsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedThailandInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29186159
PMCPMC5706686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.