Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29185468›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Consistency and flexibility in solving spatial tasks: different horses show different cognitive styles.

Paolo Baragli, Valentina Vitale, Claudio Sighieri, Antonio Lanata, Elisabetta Palagi, Adam R Reddon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  11. Human Demonstration Does Not Facilitate the Performance of Horses (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Paolo BaragliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. paolo.baragli@unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-5714
Valentina VitaleUnitat Equina, Fundació Hospital Clìnic Veterinari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudio SighieriDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio LanataDepartment of Information Engineering & Research Center "E. Piaggio", School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elisabetta PalagiMuseum of Natural History, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Adam R ReddonDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
University of Pisa · ITMcGill University · CAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual animals vary in their behaviour and reactions to novel situations. These differences may extend to differences in cognition among individuals. We tested twenty-six horses for their ability to detour around symmetric and asymmetric obstacles. All of the animals were able to get around the barrier to reach a food target, but varied in their approach. Some horses moved slowly but were more accurate in choosing the shortest way. Other horses acted quickly, consistently detoured in the same direction, and did not reliably choose the shortest way. The remaining horses shifted from a faster, directionally consistent response with the symmetric barrier, to a slower but more accurate response with the asymmetric barrier. The asymmetric barrier induced a reduction in heart rate variability, suggesting that this is a more demanding task. The different approaches used to solve the asymmetric task may reflect distinct cognitive styles in horses, which vary among individuals, and could be linked to different personality traits. Understanding equine behaviour and cognition can inform horse welfare and management.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionFemaleHorses

Identifiers

PMID29185468
PMCPMC5707407
OpenAlexW2769623134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.