Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29185232›Full record

Observational studyJournal of endocrinological investigation2018

Impaired taste sensation in type 2 diabetic patients without chronic complications: a case-control study.

L De Carli, R Gambino, C Lubrano, R Rosato, D Bongiovanni, F Lanfranco, F Broglio, E Ghigo, S Bo

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does presbygeusia really exist? An updated narrative review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L De CarliDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
R GambinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
C LubranoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
R RosatoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
D BongiovanniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
F LanfrancoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
F BroglioDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
E GhigoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
S BoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. simona.bo@unito.it.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFew and contradictory data suggest changes in taste perception in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), potentially altering food choices. We, therefore, analyzed taste recognition thresholds in T2DM patients with good metabolic control and free of conditions potentially impacting on taste, compared with age-, body mass index-, and sex-matched normoglycemic controls.

methodsAn ascending-concentration method was used, employing sucrose (sweet), sodium chloride (salty), citric acid (sour), and quinine hydrochloride (bitter), diluted in increasing concentration solutions. The recognition threshold was the lowest concentration of correct taste identification.

resultsThe recognition thresholds for the four tastes were higher in T2DM patients. In a multiple regression model, T2DM [β = 0.95; 95% CI 0.32-1.58; p = 0.004 (salty); β = 0.61; 0.19-1.03; p = 0.006 (sweet); β = 0.78; 0.15-1.40; p = 0.016 (sour); β = 0.74; 0.22-1.25; p = 0.006 (bitter)] and waist circumference [β = 0.05; 0.01-0.08; p = 0.012 (salty); β = 0.03; 0.01-0.05; p = 0.020 (sweet); β = 0.04; 0.01-0.08; p = 0.020 (sour); β = 0.04; 0.01-0.07; p = 0.007 (bitter)] were associated with the recognition thresholds. Age was associated with salty (β = 0.06; 0.01-0.12; p = 0.027) and BMI with sweet thresholds (β = 0.06; 0.01-0.11; p = 0.019).

conclusionsTaste recognition thresholds were higher in uncomplicated T2DM, and central obesity was significantly associated with this impairment. Hypogeusia may be an early sign of diabetic neuropathy and be implicated in the poor compliance of these patients to dietary recommendations.

Indexed as

AdultAgeusiaCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTasteTaste ThresholdHypogeusiaObesityTaste thresholdsType 2 diabetes mellitusWaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID29185232
OpenAlexW2769610288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.