ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2018
Translating Asthma: Dissecting the Role of Metabolomics, Genomics and Personalized Medicine.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Omics approaches in asthma research: Challenges and opportunities.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Prediction of Asthma Exacerbations in Children.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Metabolomic profiling reveals extensive adrenal suppression due to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in asthma.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Nitric Oxide and Biological Mediators in Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Genomic Predictors of Asthma Phenotypes and Treatment Response.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Advances in Asthma.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of asthma has largely stagnated over the last 25 years, but we are at the dawning of a new age wherein -omics technology can help us manage the disease objectively and rationally. Even in this new scientific age, getting the basics of asthma management right remains essential. The new technologies which can be applied to multiple biological samples include genomics (study of the genome), transcriptomics (gene transcription), lipidomics, proteomics and metabolomics (lipids, proteins and metabolites, respectively) and breathomics, using exhaled breath as a source of biomarkers, which is of particular interest in view of its non-invasive nature in pediatrics. Important applications will include the diagnosis of airways disease, including its components; the pathways driving airway pathology; monitoring the response to treatment; and measuring future risk (asthma attacks, poor lung growth trajectory). With the advent of a wide range of novel biologicals to treat asthma, -omics technology to personalize therapy will be especially important. The U-BIOPRED (Europe) and SARP (USA) groups have been most active in this field, especially using bronchoscopically obtained samples to perform cluster analyses to define new asthma endotypes. However, stability over time and consistency between investigators is imperfect. This is perhaps unsurprising; results of biomarker studies in asthma will be a composite of the underlying disease, the (variable) effects of adverse drivers such as allergen exposure and pollution, the effects of treatment, and the effects of adherence or otherwise to treatment. Ultimately, the aim should be an exhaled breath based tool with a rapid result that can be used as a routine in the clinic. However, at the moment, there are as yet no clinical applications in children of -omics technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29185231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.