Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29185150›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2018

Key Ingredients-Target Groups, Methods and Messages, and Evaluation-of Local-Level, Public Interventions to Counter Stigma and Discrimination: A Lived Experience Informed Selective Narrative Literature Review.

Laura J Ashton, Sarah E Gordon, Racheal A Reeves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Charting an Alternative Course for Mental Health-Related Anti-Stigma Social and Behaviour Change Programmes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Strategies to Reduce Mental Illness Stigma: Perspectives of People with Lived Experience and Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura J AshtonMind and Body, PO Box 26396, Epsom, Auckland, 1344, New Zealand.
Sarah E GordonUniversity of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand. sarah.e.gordon@otago.ac.nz.
Racheal A ReevesCapital & Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington South, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A proliferation of recent literature provides substantial direction as to the key ingredients-target groups, messages and methods, and evaluation-of local-level, public interventions to counter stigma and discrimination. This paper provides a selective narrative review of that literature from the perspective or standpoint of anti-stigma experts with lived experience of mental distress, the key findings of which have been synthesised and presented in diagrammatic overviews (infographics). These are intended to guide providers in planning, delivering and evaluating lived experience-directed local-level, public interventions to counter stigma and discrimination in accord with current best practice.

Indexed as

Social StigmaCommunity Mental Health ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMental DisordersMeta-Analysis as TopicNarrationPatientsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReligion and PsychologySocial DiscriminationDiscriminationEvaluationMental healthMethods and messagesStigmaTarget groups

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.