Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29185077›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2018

Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS): replication and extension of psychometric properties in youth with chronic tic disorders (CTDs).

Jeremy M Raines, Kimberly R Edwards, Martin F Sherman, Christopher I Higginson, Joel B Winnick, Kelly Navin, Julie M Gettings, Fatmata Conteh, Shannon M Bennett, Matthew W Specht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy M RainesJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly R EdwardsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster Children's Hospital and McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H, Canada. edwardkim@hhsc.ca.
Martin F ShermanLoyola University Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Christopher I HigginsonLoyola University Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Joel B WinnickDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Kelly NavinLoyola University Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Julie M GettingsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Fatmata ContehJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Shannon M BennettWeill Cornell Medical College and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Westchester, New York, USA.
Matthew W SpechtWeill Cornell Medical College and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Westchester, New York, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USLoyola University Maryland · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCornell University · USMcMaster Children's Hospital · CAPresbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with chronic tic disorders (CTDs) frequently describe aversive subjective sensory sensations that precede their tics. The first aim of the present study was to explore the psychometric properties of a standardized self-report measure to assess premonitory urges in CTDs, The Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS), by replicating the analyses of Woods et al. (J Dev Behav Pediatr 26:397-403, 2005) using a sample twice the size of theirs. The second aim was to conduct an exploratory factor analysis of the PUTS. Eighty-four youth with CTDs, recruited from a pediatric OCD and tic specialty clinic, completed the PUTS while their caregivers completed The Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ) and a demographic measure. Consistent with (Woods et al. J Dev Behav Pediatr 26:397-403, 2005), the PUTS was found to be internally consistent (α = 0.82) and significantly correlated with overall tic severity as measured by the PTQ (r = 0.24, p < 0.05) as well as the PTQ number (r = 0.34, p < 0.01) and intensity (r = 0.24, p < 0.05) subscales. A factor-analysis of the PUTS revealed a two-factor solution with one factor capturing the quality of premonitory sensations while the other factor assessed the overall intensity of the urges. These results support the use of the PUTS in reliably measuring premonitory urges, particularly in children over the age of 10 years. Additionally, these findings highlight that urges are uniformly reported across gender and age and are more closely associated with number of tics than the frequency or intensity of tics.

Indexed as

Self ReportTic DisordersAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsYoung AdultChronic Tic Disorders (CTD)Parent Tic QuestionnairePremonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS)Psychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID29185077
OpenAlexW2770952136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.