Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184971›Full record

ReviewCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2018

Positioning of proteasome inhibitors in therapy of solid malignancies.

Margot S F Roeten, Jacqueline Cloos, Gerrit Jansen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Exploring the time-dependent regulatory potential of microRNAs in breast cancer cells treated with proteasome inhibitors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margot S F RoetenDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline CloosDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.cloos@vumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-8026
Gerrit JansenAmsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Location VUmc, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting of the protein degradation pathway, in particular, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, has emerged as an attractive novel cancer chemotherapeutic modality. Although proteasome inhibitors have been most successfully applied in the treatment of hematological malignancies, they also received continuing interest for the treatment of solid tumors. In this review, we summarize the current positioning of proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of common solid malignancies (e.g., lung, colon, pancreas, breast, and head and neck cancer), addressing topics of their mechanism(s) of action, predictive factors and molecular mechanisms of resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsBortezomibCarfilzomibDrug resistanceProteasome inhibitorsSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID29184971
PMCPMC5778165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.