Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184909›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2017

Gut Permeability and Glucose Absorption Are Affected at Early Stages of Graft Rejection in a Small Bowel Transplant Rat Model.

Pablo Stringa, David Romanin, Natalia Lausada, Rodrigo Papa Gobbi, Carolina Zanuzzi, Pedro Martín, Juan Cruz Abate, Ana Cabanne, Nathalie Arnal, Leandro Vecchio and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experimental Assessment of Intestinal Damage in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death for Visceral Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  5. Preclinical Study of DCD and Normothermic Perfusion for Visceral Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo StringaInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
David RomaninInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Natalia LausadaLaboratorio de Trasplante de Organos y Tejidos (LTO-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Rodrigo Papa GobbiInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Carolina ZanuzziLaboratorio de Imágenes (CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Pedro MartínInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Juan Cruz AbateLaboratorio de Trasplante de Organos y Tejidos (LTO-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Ana CabanneInstituto de Trasplante Multiorganico, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nathalie ArnalInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argnetina.
Leandro VecchioLaboratorio de Trasplante de Organos y Tejidos (LTO-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Verónica MilesiInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Enrique PortianskyLaboratorio de Imágenes (CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Gabriel GondolesiInstituto de Trasplante Multiorganico, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin RumboInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal transplantation (ITx) faces many challenges due to the complexity of surgery and to the multiple immunological reactions that lead to the necessity of rigorous follow-up for early detection of acute cellular rejection (ACR). Our aim was to determine the kinetics of ACR using an experimental ITx model, with emphasis in the characterization of the process using different approaches, including the use of functional assays of absorptive and barrier function.

methodsITx in rats conducting serial sampling was performed. Clinical monitoring, graft histology, proinflammatory gene expression, and nitrosative stress determination were performed. Also, glucose absorption, barrier function using ovalbumin translocation, and contractile function were analyzed.

resultsThe model used reproduced the different stages of ACR. Allogeneic ITx recipients showed signs of rejection from postoperative day (POD) 5, with increasing severity until 12 POD. Histological evaluation showed mild rejection in early sampling and severe rejection at late stages, with alterations in all graft layers. IL-6, CXCL 10, IFNg, and nitrite plasmas levels showed behavior coincident with histopathology. Remarkably, allogeneic grafts showed a marked alteration of glucose absorptive capacity from POD 5 that was sustained until endpoint. Coincidently, barrier function alteration was evidenced by luminal ovalbumin translocation to serum. Contractile function was progressively impaired along ACR.

conclusionsGlucose absorption and barrier function are altered at early stages of ACR when histological alterations or gene expression changes were much subtle. This observation may provide simple evaluation tools that could be eventually translated to the clinics to contribute to early ACR diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID29184909
PMCPMC5682765
OpenAlexW2807065194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.