ReviewObstetrics & gynecology science2017
Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety.
Review in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selection of the apposite vacuum extractor during operative delivery: A biomechanical study.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Precision of vacuum cup placement and its association with subgaleal hemorrhage and associated morbidity in term neonates.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Trends in vacuum and forceps delivery in teaching hospitals and academic health systems in West Java, Indonesia: A retrospective study.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital.Singapore medical journal · 2023Article
- Anatomical and surgical considerations and outcomes in infantile Terson syndrome.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Trends and Determinants of Operative Vaginal Delivery at Two Academic Hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa 2005-2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operative vaginal birth retains an important role in current obstetric practice. However, there is an increasing trend in the rate of cesarean section in Korea. Surgical delivery is more advantageous than cesarean section, but the rate of operative vaginal delivery is decreasing for various reasons. Furthermore, there is no unified technique for vacuum extraction delivery. In this context, this review was performed to provide details of the necessary conditions, techniques, benefits, and risks of operative vaginal delivery. Future research should focus on overcoming the limitations of operative vaginal delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.