Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184833›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry2017

Comparison of Coronal Leakage in Tooth Preparation with Two Single File Systems and Three Obturation Techniques.

Eshaghali Saberi, Shahram Shahraki Zahedani, Sediqe Ebrahimipour, Neda Valian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eshaghali SaberiDepartment of Endodontics, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Dental School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Shahram Shahraki ZahedaniInfectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Sediqe EbrahimipourDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry and Dental Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Neda ValianDentist, Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesRoot canal preparation and obturation are of great importance in endodontics. Its purpose is to eliminate pulpal and periradicular disease. The aim of this study was to compare coronal bacterial microleakage in prepared root canals using Neoniti A1 and Reciproc files that obturated with lateral compaction, single cone gutta-percha, and hybrid (tapered cone/lateral compaction) methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this

resultsData analysis showed that in each group the difference in percentages between subgroups was statistically significant (

conclusionUnder the conditions of this study, independent of the instrument used for canal preparation, hybrid method and then single-cone technique, however, were more effective in the prevention of coronal leakage than lateral condensation technique.

Indexed as

Dental leakagesingle-cone obturationtooth preparation

Identifiers

PMID29184833
PMCPMC5682709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.