Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184786›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2017

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors usage and prostate cancer: a match-paired analysis.

G Luke Machen, M Hasan Rajab, Jessica Pruszynski, K Scott Coffield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G Luke MachenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology; Baylor Scott & White Health/The Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine; Temple, Texas, USA.
M Hasan RajabDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology; Baylor Scott & White Health/The Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine; Temple, Texas, USA.
Jessica PruszynskiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology; Baylor Scott & White Health/The Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine; Temple, Texas, USA.
K Scott CoffieldDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology; Baylor Scott & White Health/The Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine; Temple, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo treat erectile dysfunction (ED), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are commonly used. However, to date, only a few studies exist evaluate a possible effect on the incidence of prostate cancer. One such study completed by the authors' institution suggested men who use PDE5i for ED may have a lower incidence of prostate cancer. This study was meant to address some of the shortcomings of the former study and further characterize the link between prostate cancer and PDE5i use.

methodsA retrospective, match-paired analysis was undertaken: 5,717 patients were identified between 2000 and 2011; a 1:2 match pair analysis ultimately identified 394 cases with cancer and 788 controls without cancer. Pairs were matched based on age, ethnicity, and PSA value.

resultsNo correlation existed between PDE5i use and prostate cancer [OR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.35, P=0.8842] or diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.84-1.48, P=0.4499). A statistically significant correlation was demonstrated with PSA and prostate cancer (OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.38-1.58, P<0.0001).

conclusionsThe data suggest that there is essentially no association with PDE5i use and prostate cancer.

Indexed as

erectile dysfunction (ED)phosphodiesterase inhibitorsProstate cancerprostate neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID29184786
PMCPMC5673806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.