Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184780›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017

The role of PET/CT imaging in penile cancer.

Sarah R Ottenhof, Erik Vegt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic predictors of lymph node metastasis in penile cancer: a systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Prevalence of the most common types of high-risk HPV and p16Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Detection of lymph node metastases in penile cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah R OttenhofDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik VegtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)fluorodeoxyglucoseimagingPenile cancerPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID29184780
PMCPMC5673802
OpenAlexW2619084372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.