ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017
Liquid biopsy for monitoring anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: two cases compared.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements of ALK inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- New Advances in Liquid Biopsy Technologies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Earlier extracranial progression and shorter survival in ALK-rearranged lung cancer with positive liquid rebiopsies.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- A fully automated assay to detect the expression of pan-cytokeratins and of EML4-ALK fusion protein in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) predicts outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- Case Report: Circulating Tumor Cells as a Response Biomarker in ALK-Positive Metastatic Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Microsieves for the detection of circulating tumor cells in leukapheresis product in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three to seven percent of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients show anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-translocation and could be treated with ALK-inhibitors. However, under crizotinib, a first-generation ALK-inhibitor, patients develop drug resistance after a median of 12 months. To overcome crizotinib resistance, several next-generation ALK inhibitors have been developed. In NSCLC, liquid biopsy allowed important improvements in the detection of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The ability of liquid biopsy to detect oncogenic gene/protein fusions is a newly investigated field, and is not routinely applied yet. We here present two NSCLC patients, both rearranged for echinoderm microtubule associated-protein like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) and treated accordingly, who differed in the clinical outcome. We analyzed the predictive value of the liquid biopsy components, namely epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM)+ circulating tumor cells (CTCs), EpCAM low/neg CTCs, EML4-ALK rearranged CTCs, and cell-free mRNA (cfmRNA), during ALK-inhibitors treatment. This analysis showed a potential association between the liquid biopsy biomarkers, patients' outcome and response to treatment, thus suggesting their combined use in the clinical practice, as proposed here. This approach would allow longitudinal monitoring and consequent identification of putative drug-resistance mechanisms, in the light of improving high-risk patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.