Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184672›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017

New insights in non-small-cell lung cancer: circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA.

Elena Duréndez-Sáez, Aitor Azkárate, Marina Meri, Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas, Cristóbal Aguilar-Gallardo, Ana Blasco, Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre, Carlos Camps

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Duréndez-SáezMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Aitor AzkárateDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Marina MeriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Silvia Calabuig-FariñasMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Cristóbal Aguilar-GallardoMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ana BlascoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Eloisa Jantus-LewintreMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos CampsMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the second most frequent tumor and the leading cause of death by cancer in both men and women. Increasing knowledge about the cancer genome and tumor environment has led to a new setting in which morphological and molecular characterization is needed to treat patients in the most personalized way in order to achieve better outcomes. Since tumor products can be detected in body fluids, the liquid biopsy, particularly, peripheral blood, has emerged as a new source for lung cancer biomarker's analysis. A variety of tumor components can be used for this purpose. Among them, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) should be especially considered. Different detection methods for both CTCs and ctDNA have been and are being developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of these tests. This would lead to better characterization and would solve some clinical doubts at different disease evolution times, e.g., intratumoral or temporal heterogeneity, difficulty in the obtaining a tumor sample, etc., and would also avoid the side effects of very expensive and complicated tumor obtaining interventions. CTCs and ctDNA are useful in different lung cancer settings. Their value has been shown for the early diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of treatment efficacy, monitoring responses and early detection of lung cancer relapse. CTCs have still not been validated for use in clinical settings in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while ctDNA has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Association (EMA), and the main clinical guidelines used for detect different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and the monitoring and treatment choice of mutated patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This review, describes how ctDNA seem to be winning the race against CTCs from the laboratory bench to clinical practice due to easier obtaining methods, manipulation and its implementation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR mutations)liquid biopsyNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID29184672
PMCPMC5676108
OpenAlexW2743750316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.