Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184612›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2017

Efficacy of Prucalopride in bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Results of a pilot study.

Vito Domenico Corleto, Giulio Antonelli, Chiara Coluccio, Lucia D'Alba, Emilio di Giulio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vito Domenico CorletoDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Giulio AntonelliDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Chiara ColuccioDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Lucia D'AlbaGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Emilio di GiulioDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is a crucial diagnostic instrument for colorectal cancer screening and an adequate bowel preparation is definitely decisive for the success of the procedure. Especially in elderly patients, bowel cleansing is considered a big issue, because it is often poorly tolerated for many reasons (like inability to swallow large volume of liquids or unlikable taste); this can cause a suboptimal preparation that may lead to miss a neoplastic lesion. There is relatively little data about how to improve preparation tolerability. The purpose of our pilot study was to analyze the effect of prucalopride (Resolor

Indexed as

Bowel cleansingColonoscopyColorectal cancerPrucaloprideScreening

Identifiers

PMID29184612
PMCPMC5696608
OpenAlexW2768153294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.