ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
Antagonistic Microbial Interactions: Contributions and Potential Applications for Controlling Pathogens in the Aquatic Systems.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- New isolates of Pseudomonas and Streptomyces as bioremediation tools for aclonifen removal.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microorganism-Based Biological Products for Agriculture: From Strain Selection to Production Organization.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Prey preference and cell wall-mediated resistance shape predation efficiency in Saccharomycopsis schoenii.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Protozoan Communities and Their Contribution to Predation onEnvironmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Ecological factors that drive microbial communities in culturally diverse fermented foods.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Overcoming toxicity: How nonantagonistic microbes manage to thrive in boom-and-bust environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides: A Promising Alternative to Conventional Antimicrobials for Combating Polymicrobial Biofilms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Strategies and tools to construct stable and efficient artificial coculture systems as biosynthetic platforms for biomass conversion.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Review
- You can bring plankton to fecal indicator organisms, but you cannot make the plankton graze: particle contribution tomSphere · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Potential of Polyphenols: An Update on Alternative for Combating Antimicrobial Resistance.Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024Review
- Two Predators, One Prey - the Interaction Between Bacteriophage, Bacterivorous Ciliates, and Escherichia coli.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Biopreservative technologies of food: an alternative to chemical preservation and recent developments.Food science and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- The Effect of Protozoa Indigenous to Lakewater and Wastewater on Decay of Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Coliphage.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of bacteriophages in shaping bacterial composition and diversity in the human gut.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Removal of Waterborne Viruses byEnvironmental science & technology · 2022Article
- [The hazards of SARS-COV-2 for aquatic ecosystems].Medecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2022Article
- Solutions in microbiome engineering: prioritizing barriers to organism establishment.The ISME journal · 2022Review
- Anti-mycobacterial activity of heat and pH stable high molecular weight protein(s) secreted by a bacterial laboratory contaminant.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Antagonism between killer yeast strains as an experimental model for biological nucleation dynamics.eLife · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the active and intense treatment of wastewater, pathogenic microorganisms and viruses are frequently introduced into the aquatic environment. For most human pathogens, however, this is a rather hostile place, where starvation, continuous inactivation, and decay generally occur, rather than successful reproduction. Nevertheless, a great diversity of the pathogenic microorganisms can be detected, in particular, in the surface waters receiving wastewater. Pathogen survival depends majorly on abiotic factors such as irradiation, changes in water ionic strength, temperature, and redox state. In addition, inactivation is enhanced by the biotic interactions in the environment. Although knowledge of the antagonistic biotic interactions has been available since a long time, certain underlying processes and mechanisms still remain unclear. Others are well-appreciated and increasingly are applied to the present research. Our review compiles and discusses the presently known biotic interactions between autochthonous microbes and pathogens introduced into the aquatic environment, including protozoan grazing, virus-induced bacterial cell lysis, antimicrobial substances, and predatory bacteria. An overview is provided on the present knowledge, as well as on the obvious research gaps. Individual processes that appear promising for future applications in the aquatic environment are presented and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.