Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184524›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

A Qualitative Approach on Motives and Aspects of Risks in Freeriding.

Anika Frühauf, Will A S Hardy, Daniel Pfoestl, Franz-Georg Hoellen, Martin Kopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Spinal injury in alpine winter sports: a review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. To Analyze Thrill, Define Extreme Sports.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rock Climbing, Risk, and Recognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anika FrühaufDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Will A S HardyInstitute for the Psychology of Elite Performance, School of Sport, Health, and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Daniel PfoestlDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Franz-Georg HoellenDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin KoppDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has shown that there are multiple motives for participation in high-risk sport; however these results have come from studies that consider a number of different sports. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to better understand the motives and risk-related aspects of freeriding, using a qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 professional and semi-professional freeride skiers and snowboarders. All freeriders were highly experienced, of different age (19-44 years; 27.5 ± 4.5 years), gender (female = 13), and profession (professional athletes = 11). Analyses were done using MAXQDA software following a code theme approach. Mixed methods analyses using χ

Indexed as

extreme sporthigh-risk sportrisk-managementrisk-takingskiing

Identifiers

PMID29184524
PMCPMC5694463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.