Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184480›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2017

Low Cost Electrode Assembly for EEG Recordings in Mice.

Emily C Vogler, Daniel T Flynn, Federico Busciglio, Ryan C Bohannan, Alison Tran, Matthew Mahavongtrakul, Jorge A Busciglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic removal of synaptic ZnFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily C VoglerInstitute for Memory Impairment and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Daniel T FlynnSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Federico BusciglioDodge College of Film and Media Arts, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States.
Ryan C BohannanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Alison TranDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Matthew MahavongtrakulDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jorge A BusciglioDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

Training in the Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseT32AG000096 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI VIVEK SWARUP, Craig E Stark · 1985 to 2026
$9.6M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless electroencephalography (EEG) of small animal subjects typically utilizes miniaturized EEG devices which require a robust recording and electrode assembly that remains in place while also being well-tolerated by the animal so as not to impair the ability of the animal to perform normal living activities or experimental tasks. We developed simple and fast electrode assembly and method of electrode implantation using electrode wires and wire-wrap technology that provides both higher survival and success rates in obtaining recordings from the electrodes than methods using screws as electrodes. The new wire method results in a 51% improvement in the number of electrodes that successfully record EEG signal. Also, the electrode assembly remains affixed and provides EEG signal for at least a month after implantation. Screws often serve as recording electrodes, which require either drilling holes into the skull to insert screws or affixing screws to the surface of the skull with adhesive. Drilling holes large enough to insert screws can be invasive and damaging to brain tissue, using adhesives may interfere with conductance and result in a poor signal, and soldering screws to wire leads results in fragile connections. The methods presented in this article provide a robust implant that is minimally invasive and has a significantly higher success rate of electrode implantation. In addition, the implant remains affixed and produces good recordings for over a month, while using economical, easily obtained materials and skills readily available in most animal research laboratories.

Indexed as

EEGelectrode implantationelectroencephalographyneurologgerwireless electroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID29184480
PMCPMC5694541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.