Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184456›Full record

ArticlePatient related outcome measures2017

Validating the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS), a patient-reported measure of treatment burden, in people with diabetes.

Elizabeth A Rogers, Kathleen J Yost, Jordan K Rosedahl, Mark Linzer, Deborah H Boehm, Azra Thakur, Sara Poplau, Roger T Anderson, David T Eton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient related outcome measures, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A RogersDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kathleen J YostDepartment of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jordan K RosedahlDepartment of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark LinzerDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Deborah H BoehmMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Azra ThakurMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sara PoplauMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Roger T AndersonUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
David T EtonDepartment of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USOrthopaedic Research Foundation · USHennepin County Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002492 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI INGBAR, DAVID H · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
Developing a self-report measure of burden of treatmentR21NR012984 · NINR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ETON, DAVID T · 2012 to 2013
$427k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002492NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NINR NIH HHS R21 NR012984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo validate a comprehensive general measure of treatment burden, the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS), in people with diabetes.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study with 120 people diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and at least one additional chronic illness. Surveys included established patient-reported outcome measures and a 48-item version of the PETS, a new measure comprised of multi-item scales assessing the burden of chronic illness treatment and self-care as it relates to nine domains: medical information, medications, medical appointments, monitoring health, interpersonal challenges, health care expenses, difficulty with health care services, role activity limitations, and physical/mental exhaustion from self-management. Internal reliability of PETS scales was determined using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was determined through correlation of PETS scores with established measures (measures of chronic condition distress, medication satisfaction, self-efficacy, and global well-being), and known-groups validity through comparisons of PETS scores across clinically distinct groups. In an exploratory test of predictive validity, step-wise regressions were used to determine which PETS scales were most associated with outcomes of chronic condition distress, overall physical and mental health, and medication adherence.

resultsRespondents were 37-88 years old, 59% female, 29% non-white, and 67% college-educated. PETS scales showed good reliability (Cronbach's alphas ≥0.74). Higher PETS scale scores (greater treatment burden) were correlated with more chronic condition distress, less medication convenience, lower self-efficacy, and worse general physical and mental health. Participants less (versus more) adherent to medications and those with more (versus fewer) health care financial difficulties had higher mean PETS scores. Medication burden was the scale that was most consistently associated with well-being and patient-reported adherence.

conclusionThe PETS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing perceived treatment burden in people coping with diabetes.

Indexed as

disease managementmeasurementpatient perspectivepatient-reported measuretreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID29184456
PMCPMC5687778
OpenAlexW2767569514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.