ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2017
Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program impact on prognostic markers in selected patients with resting and exercise-induced ventilatory inefficiency: a clinical trial.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of exercise on sleep and cardiopulmonary parameters in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Trial
- Long-Term Effect of an Exercise Training Program on Physical Functioning and Quality of Life in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial.BioMed research international · 2021Trial
- Effects of exercise training on diastolic and systolic dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure.World journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Ventilatory inefficiency adversely affects outcomes and longer-term survival after planned colorectal cancer surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Ventilatory limitation is a common problem in patients with chronic heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Excess ventilation may arise from augmented ventilatory drive, over activity of chemoreceptors and muscle ergoreceptors, or premature onset of lactic acidosis. Exertional dyspnea can cause limitations in the activities of daily living and as a result, reduced quality of life for these patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program on ventilatory efficiency for these patients. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty five patients with chronic heart failure and twenty five patients with pulmonary hypertension and only forty of them completed the study. The training program consisted of interval aerobic training program, based on the results of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Training period was about five months. Outcomes were ventilatory equivalent for CO2, (VE/VCO2 at anaerobic threshold), VO2 at anaerobic threshold, VO2 max and peak work load. Echocardiography parameters were also measured; right ventricular systolic pressure for patients with pulmonary hypertension and ejection fraction for patients with chronic heart failure. [Results] Both groups showed an improvement in ventilation during exercise in favor of patients with pulmonary hypertension. VE/VCO2 decreased by 6.65 in pulmonary hypertension and by 2.9 in chronic heart failure. Right ventricular systolic pressure decreased by 12.05 mmHg in pulmonary hypertension and ejection fraction increased by 17.74% in chronic heart failure. [Conclusion] Physical therapy cardiopulmonary rehabilitation should be considered in managing patients with ventilatory limitation such as pulmonary hypertension and chronic heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.