Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184254›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2017

Characterization of probiotic potential of

K Ragul, Ibadondor Syiem, K Sundar, Prathapkumar H Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Food science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PreliminaryIranian journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  11. In Vitro Evaluation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Potential application of the probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Beyond Archaea: The Table Salt Bacteriome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K RagulDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014 India.
Ibadondor SyiemDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014 India.
K SundarDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014 India.
Prathapkumar H ShettyDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fermented foods are known for their potential as main source of probiotics. The present study aimed at investigating the probiotic properties of bacteria isolated from fermented mango pickle. Non-hemolytic fermenting microbiota isolated from mango pickle was screened in vitro for their basic probiotic properties such as acid tolerance, bile salt, lysozyme and salt tolerance. They were also tested for their beneficial characters like cholesterol removal, bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons, auto-aggregation, antimicrobial activity, β-galactosidase activity, exopolysaccharide production and adhesion to HT-29 cell line. Outputs of these parameters were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) and these results were interpreted to select prospective bacterial isolates that can be used as potential probiotics. Out of eight isolates, PUFSTP35 (

Indexed as

Bacillus sp.Fermented foodHealth benefitsMango pickleProbiotic properties

Identifiers

PMID29184254
PMCPMC5686028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.