Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184155›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2017

Isolation and molecular characterization of prevalent Fowl adenovirus strains in southwestern China during 2015-2016 for the development of a control strategy.

Jing Xia, Ke-Chang Yao, Yue-Yue Liu, Guo-Jin You, Su-Yun Li, Ping Liu, Qin Zhao, Yi-Ping Wen Rui Wu, Xiao-Bo Huang, San-Jie Cao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jing XiaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Ke-Chang YaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Yue-Yue LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Guo-Jin YouCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Su-Yun LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Ping LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Qin ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Yi-Ping Wen Rui WuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Xiao-Bo HuangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
San-Jie CaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Xin-Feng HanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Yong HuangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) has caused significant losses in chicken flocks throughout China in recent years. However, the current understanding of the genetic and pathogenic characteristics of the FAdV epidemic in southwestern China remains poorly understood. In this study, a total of 22 strains were isolated from liver samples of diseased chickens from farms in southwestern China. Phylogenetic analysis based on the hexon loop-1 gene showed that the 22 isolates were clustered into four distinct serotypes: FAdV serotype 4 (FAdV-4) (86.4%, 19/22), FAdV-2 (4.5%, 1/22), FAdV-8a (4.5%, 1/22), and FAdV-8b (4.5%, 1/22). FAdV-4 was the predominant serotype in southwestern China. Pathogenicity testing showed that the FAdV-4 serotype strain CH/GZXF/1602 and FAdV-8a strain CH/CQBS/1504 were pathogenic to chickens, with mortality rates reaching as high as 80% and 20%, respectively. The primary clinical feature observed following infection with strain CH/GZXF/1602 (FAdV-4) was hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome, and that of strain CH/CQBS/1504 (FAdV-8a) was inclusion body hepatitis. Conversely, the FAdV-2 serotype strain CH/GZXF/1511 and FAdV-8b serotype strain CH/CQBS/1512 was not observed to be pathogenic in chickens. Then, CH/GZXF/1602 (FAdV-4) was selected for the preparation of an inactivated oil-emulsion vaccine. Immune studies on Partridge Shank broilers showed that a single dose immunization at 17 days of age could not only protect against homologous challenge with virulent FAdV-4 but also provided protection against clinical disease following challenge with the heterologous FAdV-8b virulent strain until 70 days of age. The characterization of newly prevalent FAdV strains provides a valuable reference for the development of an efficacious control strategy.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdenoviridae InfectionsAnimalsAviadenovirusCapsid ProteinsChickensChinaGenotypeHepatitis, Viral, AnimalLiverPhylogenyPoultry DiseasesSerogroupSurvival AnalysisVaccines, InactivatedViral VaccinesCapsid Proteinshexon capsid protein, AdenovirusVaccines, InactivatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29184155
PMCPMC5717092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.