Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Deciphering how Cpl-7 cell wall-binding repeats recognize the bacterial peptidoglycan.

Noemí Bustamante, Manuel Iglesias-Bexiga, Noelia Bernardo-García, Noella Silva-Martín, Guadalupe García, María A Campanero-Rhodes, Esther García, Isabel Usón, Rubén M Buey, Pedro García and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel endolysin fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A New Phage Lysin Isolated from the Oral Microbiome TargetingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noemí BustamanteInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Iglesias-BexigaInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia Bernardo-GarcíaInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Noella Silva-MartínInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Guadalupe GarcíaInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
María A Campanero-RhodesInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Esther GarcíaCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Isabel UsónInstituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Baldiri Reixach 13, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Rubén M BueyMetabolic Engineering Group. Departamento de Microbiología y Genética, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Pedro GarcíaCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Juan A HermosoInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Marta BruixInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita MenéndezInstituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 119, 28006, Madrid, Spain. mmenendez@iqfr.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-4443
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endolysins, the cell wall lytic enzymes encoded by bacteriophages to release the phage progeny, are among the top alternatives to fight against multiresistant pathogenic bacteria; one of the current biggest challenges to global health. Their narrow range of susceptible bacteria relies, primarily, on targeting specific cell-wall receptors through specialized modules. The cell wall-binding domain of Cpl-7 endolysin, made of three CW_7 repeats, accounts for its extended-range of substrates. Using as model system the cell wall-binding domain of Cpl-7, here we describe the molecular basis for the bacterial cell wall recognition by the CW_7 motif, which is widely represented in sequences of cell wall hydrolases. We report the crystal and solution structure of the full-length domain, identify N-acetyl-D-glucosaminyl-(β1,4)-N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (GMDP) as the peptidoglycan (PG) target recognized by the CW_7 motifs, and characterize feasible GMDP-CW_7 contacts. Our data suggest that Cpl-7 cell wall-binding domain might simultaneously bind to three PG chains, and also highlight the potential use of CW_7-containing lysins as novel anti-infectives.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceBacteriaBacteriolysisBacteriophagesBinding SitesCell WallEndopeptidasesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularPeptidoglycanProtein BindingProtein ConformationStructure-Activity RelationshipendolysinEndopeptidasesPeptidoglycan

Identifiers

PMID29184076
PMCPMC5705596
OpenAlexW2769429634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.