Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29184014›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Recipient-Biased Competition for an Intracellularly Generated Cross-Fed Nutrient Is Required for Coexistence of Microbial Mutualists.

Alexandra L McCully, Breah LaSarre, James B McKinlay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A purine salvage bottleneck leads to bacterial adenine cross-feeding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The microbial exometabolome: ecological resource and architect of microbial communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra L McCullyDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Breah LaSarreDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
James B McKinlayDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA jmckinla@indiana.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many mutualistic microbial relationships are based on nutrient cross-feeding. Traditionally, cross-feeding is viewed as being unidirectional, from the producer to the recipient. This is likely true when a producer's waste, such as a fermentation product, has value only for a recipient. However, in some cases the cross-fed nutrient holds value for both the producer and the recipient. In such cases, there is potential for nutrient reacquisition by producer cells in a population, leading to competition against recipients. Here, we investigated the consequences of interpartner competition for cross-fed nutrients on mutualism dynamics by using an anaerobic coculture pairing fermentative

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisSymbiosisAmmonium CompoundsCarbonCarboxylic AcidsComputer SimulationEscherichia coliFermentationPopulation DynamicsRhodopseudomonasAmmonium CompoundsCarbonCarboxylic Acidscoculturecross-feedingfermentationhydrogenmicrobial communitiesmutualismnitrogen fixationpurple bacteriasynthetic ecology

Identifiers

PMID29184014
PMCPMC5705916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.