Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183957›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2018

Marriage and risk of dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Andrew Sommerlad, Joshua Ruegger, Archana Singh-Manoux, Glyn Lewis, Gill Livingston

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
49.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selected social and lifestyle correlates of brain health markers: the Cross-Cohort Collaboration Consortium.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The association between lifetime marital histories and later-life cognitive function: evidence from the United States and China.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Migraine and the Risk of Dementia in the General Population.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew SommerladDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-7055
Joshua RueggerCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Archana Singh-ManouxINSERM U 1018, Epidemiology of Ageing and Age-Related Diseases, Villejuif, France.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GBInserm · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200163/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing married is associated with healthier lifestyle behaviours and lower mortality and may reduce risk for dementia due to life-course factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between marital status and the risk of developing dementia.

methodsWe searched medical databases and contacted experts in the field for relevant studies reporting the relationship, adjusted for age and sex, between marital status and dementia. We rated methodological quality and conducted random-effects meta-analyses to summarise relative risks of being widowed, divorced or lifelong single, compared with being married. Secondary stratified analyses with meta-regression examined the impact of clinical and social context and study methodology on findings.

resultsWe included 15 studies with 812 047 participants. Compared with those who are married, lifelong single (relative risk=1.42 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.90)) and widowed (1.20 (1.02 to 1.41)) people have elevated risk of dementia. We did not find an association in divorced people.Further analyses showed that less education partially confounds the risk in widowhood and worse physical health the elevated risk in lifelong single people. Compared with studies that used clinical registers for ascertaining dementia diagnoses, those which clinically examined all participants found higher risk for being unmarried.

conclusionsBeing married is associated with reduced risk of dementia than widowed and lifelong single people, who are also underdiagnosed in routine clinical practice. Dementia prevention in unmarried people should focus on education and physical health and should consider the possible effect of social engagement as a modifiable risk factor.

Indexed as

Confounding Factors, EpidemiologicDementiaDivorceEducational StatusHumansMarital StatusMarriageObservational Studies as TopicProtective FactorsRisk FactorsSingle PersonWidowhood

Identifiers

PMID29183957
PMCPMC5869449
OpenAlexW2770396411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.