Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183399›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol.

Lesley A Stewart, Mark Simmonds, Lelia Duley, Kristina Charlotte Dietz, Melissa Harden, Alex Hodkinson, Alexis Llewellyn, Sahar Sharif, Ruth Walker, Kath Wright and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lesley A StewartCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. lesley.stewart@york.ac.uk.
Mark SimmondsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Lelia DuleyNottingham Clinical Trials Unit Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Kristina Charlotte DietzCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Melissa HardenCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Alex HodkinsonCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Alexis LlewellynCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Sahar SharifCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ruth WalkerCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Kath WrightCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
EPPPIC group
University of York · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10107Medical Research Council G0801402Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute PPA-1608-35707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is the most common cause of death and harm to newborn babies. Babies that are born early may have difficulties at birth and experience health problems during early childhood. Despite extensive study, there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of progestogen (medications that are similar to the natural hormone progesterone) in preventing or delaying preterm birth, and in improving birth outcomes. The Evaluating Progestogen for Prevention of Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC) project aims to reduce uncertainty about the specific conditions in which progestogen may (or may not) be effective in preventing or delaying preterm birth and improving birth outcomes.

methodsThe design of the study involves international collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis comprising systematic review, re-analysis, and synthesis of trial datasets. Inclusion criteria are as follows: randomized controlled trials comparing progestogen versus placebo or non-intervention, or comparing different types of progestogen, in asymptomatic women at risk of preterm birth. Main outcomes are as follows; fetal/infant death, preterm birth or fetal death (<=37 weeks, <=34 weeks, <= 28 weeks), serious neonatal complications or fetal/infant death, neurosensory disability (measured at 18 months or later) or infant/child death, important maternal morbidity, or maternal death. In statistical methods, IPD will be synthesized across trials using meta-analysis. Both 'two-stage' models (where effect estimates are calculated for each trial and subsequently pooled in a meta-analysis) and 'one-stage' models (where all IPD from all trials are analyzed in one step, while accounting for the clustering of participants within trials) will be used. If sufficient suitable data are available, a network meta-analysis will compare all types of progesterone and routes of administration extending the one-stage models to include multiple treatment arms. DISCUSSION: EPPPIC is an international collaborative project being conducted by the forming EPPPIC group, which includes trial investigators, an international secretariat, and the research project team. Results, which are intended to contribute to improvements in maternal and child health, are expected to be publicly available in mid 2018. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017068299.

Indexed as

International CooperationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMaternal MortalityMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyPremature BirthPrenatal CareProgestinsSystematic Reviews as TopicProgestinsIndividual participant dataIPDMeta-analysisPreterm birthProgestogen

Identifiers

PMID29183399
PMCPMC5706301
OpenAlexW2769789383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.