Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183390›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2017

Serum concentrations of active tamoxifen metabolites predict long-term survival in adjuvantly treated breast cancer patients.

Thomas Helland, Nina Henne, Ersilia Bifulco, Bjørn Naume, Elin Borgen, Vessela N Kristensen, Jan T Kvaløy, Timothy L Lash, Grethe I G Alnæs, Ron H van Schaik and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas HellandHormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Nina HenneDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ersilia BifulcoDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bjørn NaumeDepartment of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Elin BorgenPathology Department, Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Vessela N KristensenDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Jan T KvaløyDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Timothy L LashDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Grethe I G AlnæsDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Ron H van SchaikExpert Center Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Emiel A M JanssenDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Steinar HustadDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ernst A LienHormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Gunnar MellgrenHormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Håvard SøilandDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. hsoiland@gmail.com.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOEmory University · USErasmus MC · NLUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Helse Vest 912031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversies exist as to whether the genetic polymorphisms of the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of tamoxifen can predict breast cancer outcome in patients using adjuvant tamoxifen. Direct measurement of concentrations of active tamoxifen metabolites in serum may be a more biological plausible and robust approach. We have investigated the association between CYP2D6 genotypes, serum concentrations of active tamoxifen metabolites, and long-term outcome in tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients.

methodsFrom an original observational study comprising 817 breast cancer patients, 99 women with operable breast cancer were retrospectively included in the present study. This cohort of patients were adjuvantly treated with tamoxifen, had provided serum samples suitable for measuring tamoxifen metabolites, and were relapse-free at 3 years after the primary treatment commenced. The median follow-up time from this entry point to breast cancer death was 13.9 years. Patients were CYP2D6 genotyped and grouped into four CYP2D6 phenotype groups (Ultra rapid, extensive, intermediate, and poor metabolizers). Tamoxifen and nine metabolites were quantified in serum (n = 86) and compared with CYP2D6 phenotype groups and outcome.

resultsBreast cancer patients with low concentrations of Z-4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (Z-4OHtam; ≤ 3.26 nM) had a breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of 60% compared to 84% in patients with Z-4OHtam concentrations > 3.26 nM (p = 0.020, log-rank hazard ratio (HR) = 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14-11.07). For patients with Z-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (Z-endoxifen) levels ≤ 9.00 nM BCSS was 57% compared to 84% for patients with concentrations > 9.00 nM (p = 0.029, HR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.05-13.22). Low concentrations of Z-4OHtam and Z-endoxifen were associated with poorer survival also after adjusting for clinically relevant variables (HR = 4.27, 95% CI = 1.35-13.58, and HR = 3.70, 95% CI = 1.03-13.25, respectively). Overall survival analysis showed similar survival differences for both active metabolites. The Antiestrogen Activity Score showed comparable effects, but did not improve the prognostic information.

conclusionsPatients with Z-4OHtam and Z-endoxifen concentrations lower than 3.26 nM or 9.00 nM, respectively, showed an adverse outcome. Our results suggest that direct measurement of active tamoxifen metabolite concentrations could be of clinical value. Validation in larger study cohorts is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6FemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPharmacogenomic VariantsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Tamoxifen4OHtamAdjuvantBreast cancerCYP2D6EndoxifenMetabolismPrognosisSurvivalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID29183390
PMCPMC5706168
OpenAlexW2768884428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.