Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183384›Full record

ReviewTrials2017

Core Health Outcomes In Childhood Epilepsy (CHOICE): protocol for the selection of a core outcome set.

Christopher Morris, Colin Dunkley, Frances M Gibbon, Janet Currier, Deborah Roberts, Morwenna Rogers, Holly Crudgington, Lucy Bray, Bernie Carter, Dyfrig Hughes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the engagement of children and families in selecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and developing their measures: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sleep and epilepsy: unfortunate bedfellows.Archives of disease in childhood · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher MorrisPeninsula Cerebra Research Unit (PenCRU) & NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. Christopher.Morris@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-507X
Colin DunkleySherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton in Ashfield, UK.
Frances M GibbonNoah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Janet CurrierInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.
Deborah RobertsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.
Morwenna RogersEvidence Synthesis Team, NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Holly CrudgingtonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Lucy BrayChildren, Young People and Families, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Bernie CarterEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Dyfrig HughesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Catrin Tudur SmithMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paula R WilliamsonMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paul GringrasEvelina London Children's Hospital and King's College London, London, UK.
Deb K PalInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBEdge Hill University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBBangor University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20007Medical Research Council MR/K025635/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0615-20007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing recognition that establishing a core set of outcomes to be evaluated and reported in trials of interventions for particular conditions will improve the usefulness of health research. There is no established core outcome set for childhood epilepsy. The aim of this work is to select a core outcome set to be used in evaluative research of interventions for children with rolandic epilepsy, as an exemplar of common childhood epilepsy syndromes.

methodsFirst we will identify what outcomes should be measured; then we will decide how to measure those outcomes. We will engage relevant UK charities and health professional societies as partners, and convene advisory panels for young people with epilepsy and parents of children with epilepsy. We will identify candidate outcomes from a search for trials of interventions for childhood epilepsy, statutory guidance and consultation with our advisory panels. Families, charities and health, education and neuropsychology professionals will be invited to participate in a Delphi survey following recommended practices in the development of core outcome sets. Participants will be able to recommend additional outcome domains. Over three rounds of Delphi survey participants will rate the importance of candidate outcome domains and state the rationale for their decisions. Over the three rounds we will seek consensus across and between families and health professionals on the more important outcomes. A face-to-face meeting will be convened to ratify the core outcome set. We will then review and recommend ways to measure the shortlisted outcomes using clinical assessment and/or patient-reported outcome measures. DISCUSSION: Our methodology is a proportionate and pragmatic approach to expediently produce a core outcome set for evaluative research of interventions aiming to improve the health of children with epilepsy. A number of decisions have to be made when designing a study to develop a core outcome set including defining the scope, choosing which stakeholders to engage, most effective ways to elicit their views, especially children and a potential role for qualitative research.

Indexed as

Endpoint DeterminationResearch DesignAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolConsensusDelphi TechniqueEpilepsy, RolandicHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsStakeholder ParticipationTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomChildrenCore outcome setEpilepsyPaediatricYoung people

Identifiers

PMID29183384
PMCPMC5706367
OpenAlexW2768490835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.