Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183357›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2017

Automated telephone interventions for problematic alcohol use in clinical and population samples: a randomized controlled trial.

Claes Andersson, Mikael Gajecki, Agneta Öjehagen, Anne H Berman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01958359 (Screening and Brief Intervention Via IVR for Problematic Use of Alcohol), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01958359 nacompletednot on this map

Screening and Brief Intervention Via IVR for Problematic Use of Alcohol: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2011 to 2014Enrolled260ConditionsProblem DrinkingArmsShort IVR, Therapeutic IVR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claes AnderssonDepartment of Criminology, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, 205 06, Malmö, Sweden. claes.andersson@mah.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-2474
Mikael GajeckiCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agneta ÖjehagenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anne H BermanCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

VINNOVA 2009-00192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective was to evaluate 6-month outcomes for brief and extensive automated telephony interventions targeting problematic alcohol use, in comparison to an assessment-only control group. The secondary objective was to compare levels of problematic alcohol use (hazardous, harmful or probable dependence), gender and age among study participants from clinical psychiatric and addiction outpatient settings and from population-based telephone helpline users and Internet help-seeker samples.

resultsThe Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used for screening of problematic alcohol use and 6-month follow-up assessment. A total of 248 of help-seekers with at least hazardous use (AUDIT scores of ≥ 6/≥ 8 for women/men) were recruited from clinical and general population settings. Minor recruitment group differences were identified with respect to AUDIT scores and age at baseline. One hundred and sixty persons (64.5%) did not complete the follow-up assessment. The attrition group had a higher proportion of probable dependence (71% vs. 56%; p = 0.025), and higher scores on the total AUDIT, and its subscales for alcohol consumption and alcohol problems. At follow up, within-group problem levels had declined across all three groups, but there were no significant between-group differences. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01958359, Registered October 9, 2013. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

TelephoneAdultAlcoholismCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleAddictionAlcoholAutomatedDependenceHazardousHelp seekersInterventionOutpatientPsychiatryRandomizedTelephone

Identifiers

PMID29183357
PMCPMC5704400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.