ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2017
Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation dose comparison of photon-counting breast CT and mammography: A phantom study.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Pectoral Muscle Visualisation as an Indicator of Positioning Quality in Screening Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Mammography Acquisition Parameters on AI and Radiologist Interpretive Performance.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- The Breast Impact Monitoring System: A Portable and Wearable Platform to Support Injury Prevention in Female Athletes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated Software Evaluation in Screening Mammography: A Scoping Review of Image Quality and Technique Assessment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Quantitative Changes in Breast Density and Mammographic Features Induced by Pregnancy and Lactation: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of breast imaging · 2025Article
- Factors associated with false-positive screening mammography in São Paulo, Brazil.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Addressing Global Gaps in Mammography Screening for Improved Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
- Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.European radiology · 2024Article
- Successes and challenges in extracting information from DICOM image databases for audit and research.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Influence of mammographic density and compressed breast thickness on true mammographic sensitivity: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- To what extent are objectively measured mammographic imaging techniques associated with compression outcomes.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- EFFECT OF MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGING PROCEDURE ON SERUM INFLAMMATORY AND/OR TUMOR MARKER LEVELS.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Article
- Flat-panel conebeam CT in the clinic: history and current state.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2020Article
- Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.European journal of breast health · 2020Article
- Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2020Article
- Article
- Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.European radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn mammography, breast compression is applied to reduce the thickness of the breast. While it is widely accepted that firm breast compression is needed to ensure acceptable image quality, guidelines remain vague about how much compression should be applied during mammogram acquisition. A quantitative parameter indicating the desirable amount of compression is not available. Consequently, little is known about the relationship between the amount of breast compression and breast cancer detectability. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of breast compression pressure in mammography on breast cancer screening outcomes.
methodsWe used digital image analysis methods to determine breast volume, percent dense volume, and pressure from 132,776 examinations of 57,179 women participating in the Dutch population-based biennial breast cancer screening program. Pressure was estimated by dividing the compression force by the area of the contact surface between breast and compression paddle. The data was subdivided into quintiles of pressure and the number of screen-detected cancers, interval cancers, false positives, and true negatives were determined for each group. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for correlation between examinations of the same woman and for the effect of breast density and volume when estimating sensitivity, specificity, and other performance measures. Sensitivity was computed using interval cancers occurring between two screening rounds and using interval cancers within 12 months after screening. Pair-wise testing for significant differences was performed.
resultsPercent dense volume increased with increasing pressure, while breast volume decreased. Sensitivity in quintiles with increasing pressure was 82.0%, 77.1%, 79.8%, 71.1%, and 70.8%. Sensitivity based on interval cancers within 12 months was significantly lower in the highest pressure quintile compared to the third (84.3% vs 93.9%, p = 0.034). Specificity was lower in the lowest pressure quintile (98.0%) compared to the second, third, and fourth group (98.5%, p < 0.005). Specificity of the fifth quintile was 98.4%.
conclusionResults suggest that if too much pressure is applied during mammography this may reduce sensitivity. In contrast, if pressure is low this may decrease specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.