Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183314›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2017

Does clinical supervision of healthcare professionals improve effectiveness of care and patient experience? A systematic review.

David A Snowdon, Sandra G Leggat, Nicholas F Taylor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Empowering Parent Carers of Children With Neurodisability in Healthcare Settings: Co-Producing a Theory of Change for Intervention Development.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Co-Designing Lived Experience Guide Support for First Responder Mental Health: Defining the Role and Considerations for Implementation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Advocating for Professional Advocates in Nursing and Midwifery.Policy, politics & nursing practice · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David A SnowdonSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia. david@snowdon.name.
Sandra G LeggatSchool of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Nicholas F TaylorSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure quality of care delivery clinical supervision has been implemented in health services. While clinical supervision of health professionals has been shown to improve patient safety, its effect on other dimensions of quality of care is unknown. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine whether clinical supervision of health professionals improves effectiveness of care and patient experience.

methodsDatabases MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and AMED were searched from earliest date available. Additional studies were identified by searching of reference lists and citation tracking. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each study was rated using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Data were extracted on effectiveness of care (process of care and patient health outcomes) and patient experience.

resultsSeventeen studies across multiple health professions (medical (n = 4), nursing (n = 7), allied health (n = 2) and combination of nursing, medical and/or allied health (n = 4)) met the inclusion criteria. The clinical heterogeneity of the included studies precluded meta-analysis. Twelve of 14 studies investigating 38,483 episodes of care found that clinical supervision improved the process of care. This effect was most predominant in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and African health settings. Three of six studies investigating 1756 patients found that clinical supervision improved patient health outcomes, namely neurological recovery post cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 1) and psychological symptom severity (n = 2). None of three studies investigating 1856 patients found that clinical supervision had an effect on patient experience.

conclusionsClinical supervision of health professionals is associated with effectiveness of care. The review found significant improvement in the process of care that may improve compliance with processes that are associated with enhanced patient health outcomes. While few studies found a direct effect on patient health outcomes, when provided to mental health professionals clinical supervision may be associated with a reduction in psychological symptoms of patients diagnosed with a mental illness. There was no association found between clinical supervision and the patient experience. REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42015029643 .

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesHumansMental DisordersOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionClinical supervisionEffectiveness of carePatient experienceQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID29183314
PMCPMC5706384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.