Trial reportJAMA2017
Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 320 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Trial of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) Delivered by Capsule vs Colonoscopy in the Management of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)
Fecal Microbiota Transplant as Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy
Lyophilized Fecal Microbiome Transfer for Primary Clostridioides Difficile Infection (DONATE Study): a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial
Intestinal Microbiota Transplant Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (MAST) Trial
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (Autologous) in Infants Treated With Antibiotics
Disentangling Microbiome Engraftment by Multi-omics of the Gut Ecosystem During Fecal Transplant
Who cites it
320 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 583 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in obesity: a comprehensive overview from basic research to clinical application.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for chronic constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis integrating pre-post and single-arm evidence.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of clinical trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Safety comparison of single-donor and pooled fecal microbiota transfer product preparation in ulcerative colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of treatments for recurrentFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- What Are the Key Gut Microbiota Involved in Neurological Diseases? A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Feasibility and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in adolescents with refractory irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized clinical pilot trial.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Trial
- 15-strain live biotherapeutic product or same donor fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a randomized phase 1b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Fecal microbiota transplantation plus pembrolizumab and axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the randomized phase 2 TACITO trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Three-dimensionally printed navigational template technology for lung biopsy: a noninferiority, randomized trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Autologous fecal microbiota capsules are safe and potentially preserve beta-cell function in individuals with type 1 diabetes.Gut microbes · 2025Trial
- Pilot Clinical Trial of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Constipation in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Trial
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for hypertension: an exploratory, multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.Microbiome · 2025Trial
- Fecal microbiota transplantation restores gut microbiota diversity in children with active Crohn's disease: a prospective trial.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Trial
- Five-Day Treatment withNutrients · 2025Trial
260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective in preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). However, it is not known whether clinical efficacy differs by route of delivery. Objective: To determine whether FMT by oral capsule is noninferior to colonoscopy delivery in efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Noninferiority, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in 3 academic centers in Alberta, Canada. A total of 116 adult patients with RCDI were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. The noninferiority margin was 15%. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to FMT by capsule or by colonoscopy at a 1:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without RCDI 12 weeks after FMT. Secondary outcomes included (1) serious and minor adverse events, (2) changes in quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Survey on a scale of 0 (worst possible quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), and (3) patient perception on a scale of 1 (not at all unpleasant) to 10 (extremely unpleasant) and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (best) to 10 (worst). Results: Among 116 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [19] years; 79 women [68%]), 105 (91%) completed the trial, with 57 patients randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of RCDI after a single treatment was achieved in 96.2% in both the capsule group (51/53) and the colonoscopy group (50/52) (difference, 0%; 1-sided 95% CI, -6.1% to infinity; P < .001), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. One patient in each group died of underlying cardiopulmonary illness unrelated to FMT. Rates of minor adverse events were 5.4% for the capsule group vs 12.5% for the colonoscopy group. There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in quality of life. A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving capsules rated their experience as "not at all unpleasant" (66% vs 44%; difference, 22% [95% CI, 3%-40%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with RCDI, FMT via oral capsules was not inferior to delivery by colonoscopy for preventing recurrent infection over 12 weeks. Treatment with oral capsules may be an effective approach to treating RCDI. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02254811.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.