Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29183074›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2017

Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dina Kao, Brandi Roach, Marisela Silva, Paul Beck, Kevin Rioux, Gilaad G Kaplan, Hsiu-Ju Chang, Stephanie Coward, Karen J Goodman, Huiping Xu and 6 more

7 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 320 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
320citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
38.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02254811 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Trial of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) Delivered by Capsule vs Colonoscopy in the Management of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled116ConditionsEnterocolitis Clostridium Difficile RecurrentArmsFecal Microbiota Transplant
NCT03420482 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Microbiota Transplant as Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2018 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsHepatic EncephalopathyArmsFecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) oral capsules, Placebo oral capsule
NCT05709184 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Lyophilized Fecal Microbiome Transfer for Primary Clostridioides Difficile Infection (DONATE Study): a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRambam Health Care CampusRan2023 to 2026Enrolled196ConditionsClostridioides Difficile InfectionArmsLyophilized fecal microbiome transfer, Vancomycin
NCT05790356 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsArthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Fecal Microbiota TransplantationArmsFecal Microbial transplant, Placebo capsules
NCT06355583 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Intestinal Microbiota Transplant Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (MAST) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsAcute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia, Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic LeukemiaArmsEBX-102, Placebo
NCT06609980 phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (Autologous) in Infants Treated With Antibiotics

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2024 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsAntibiotic TreatmentArmsautologous fecal matter transplant
NCT06992453 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Disentangling Microbiome Engraftment by Multi-omics of the Gut Ecosystem During Fecal Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRan2026 to 2029Enrolled90ConditionsRecurrent C. Difficile (rCDI), Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Metabolic Syndrome (MetS)ArmsFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

320 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 583 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Five-Day Treatment withNutrients · 2025
    Trial

260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dina KaoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Brandi RoachDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Marisela SilvaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Paul BeckDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kevin RiouxDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Gilaad G KaplanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hsiu-Ju ChangUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stephanie CowardDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen J GoodmanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Huiping XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Karen MadsenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Andrew MasonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gane Ka-Shu WongDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Juan JovelDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jordan PattersonDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Thomas LouieDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USShenzhen University · CNUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective in preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). However, it is not known whether clinical efficacy differs by route of delivery. Objective: To determine whether FMT by oral capsule is noninferior to colonoscopy delivery in efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Noninferiority, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in 3 academic centers in Alberta, Canada. A total of 116 adult patients with RCDI were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. The noninferiority margin was 15%. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to FMT by capsule or by colonoscopy at a 1:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without RCDI 12 weeks after FMT. Secondary outcomes included (1) serious and minor adverse events, (2) changes in quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Survey on a scale of 0 (worst possible quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), and (3) patient perception on a scale of 1 (not at all unpleasant) to 10 (extremely unpleasant) and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (best) to 10 (worst). Results: Among 116 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [19] years; 79 women [68%]), 105 (91%) completed the trial, with 57 patients randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of RCDI after a single treatment was achieved in 96.2% in both the capsule group (51/53) and the colonoscopy group (50/52) (difference, 0%; 1-sided 95% CI, -6.1% to infinity; P < .001), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. One patient in each group died of underlying cardiopulmonary illness unrelated to FMT. Rates of minor adverse events were 5.4% for the capsule group vs 12.5% for the colonoscopy group. There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in quality of life. A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving capsules rated their experience as "not at all unpleasant" (66% vs 44%; difference, 22% [95% CI, 3%-40%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with RCDI, FMT via oral capsules was not inferior to delivery by colonoscopy for preventing recurrent infection over 12 weeks. Treatment with oral capsules may be an effective approach to treating RCDI. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02254811.

Indexed as

Administration, OralColonoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCapsulesClostridium InfectionsFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeSecondary PreventionCapsules

Identifiers

PMID29183074
PMCPMC5820695
OpenAlexW2769536540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.