Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182903›Full record

ArticleIl Giornale di chirurgia

Total laparoscopic splenectomy for giant epidermoid cyst: a case report.

P Lobascio, G Carbotta, R Laforgia, S Fedele, M G Sederino, M Minafra, A Delvecchio, F Ferrarese, N Palasciano

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Il Giornale di chirurgia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Minimally invasive surgery for giant splenic cysts.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

P Lobascio
G Carbotta
R Laforgia
S Fedele
M G Sederino
M Minafra
A Delvecchio
F Ferrarese
N Palasciano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSplenic cysts are benign tumors, accidentally detected using US or CT scan. They are classified into true cyst (primary, 25%) and pseudocyst (secondary, 75%). Conventional treatment of splenic cyst, especially giant, symptomatic and complicated has been open or laparoscopic total splenectomy. Recently, partial splenectomy is recommended as well to preserve its hematopoietic function and homeostasis of blood, but it is not considered safe for complications as intra and post operative bleeding. CASE REPORT: A 46 years old man, martial arts practitioner, underwent US abdomen scan because of left upper quadrant pain, with evidence of a splenic mass. He underwent also CT and MRI, which revealed "oval giant splenic mass of 12 cm diameter located in superior splenic pole that can be firstly referred to cyst". Considered patient's frequency to thoraco-abdominal traumas, we decided to perform a total laparoscopic splenectomy. Surgical treatment was performed with a three trocar technique and lasted 150 minutes. Post-operative follow-up was regular and abdominal drain was removed in 4th POD (Post Operative Day). Patient was discharged in 5th POD. Pathological examination revealed epidermoid cyst.

conclusionsTotal splenectomy needs to be performed in cases of giant cyst and in our limited experience it is a safe approach.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyEpidermal CystHumansMaleMiddle AgedSplenectomySplenic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29182903
PMCPMC5725165
OpenAlexW2772125674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.