Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182788›Full record

ArticleTree physiology2018

Does winter desiccation account for seasonal increases in supercooling capacity of Norway spruce bud primordia?

Edith Kuprian, Sabrina Koch, Caspar Munkler, Anna Resnyak, Othmar Buchner, Marian Oberhammer, Gilbert Neuner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tree physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. New Insights in Potato Leaf Freezing by Infrared Thermography.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cold Hardiness in Trees: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edith KuprianUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabrina KochUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Caspar MunklerUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna ResnyakUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Othmar BuchnerUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Marian OberhammerUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Gilbert NeunerUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Unit Functional Plant Biology, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bud primordia of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. remain ice free at subzero temperatures by supercooling. Once ice forms inside the primordium, it is immediately injured. Supercooling capacity increases seasonally from ~-5 °C to as much as -50 °C by currently unknown mechanisms. Among other prerequisites, dehydration of tissues over the winter months has been considered to play a key role in freezing tolerance. In this regard, the water content of bud primordia may be crucial, especially in reference to supercooling. In order to assess the role of dehydration in supercooling capacity, seasonal changes in supercooling capacity and the water potential of bud primordia of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst were measured at two sites that differed by 1298 m in elevation, after artificial frost hardening and dehardening treatments and after controlled bench drying. The extent of supercooling of bud primordia varied from -7 °C in summer to -24.6 °C in winter, a difference of 17.6 -19.3 K. Total actual water potential (Ψtact) of bud primordia was -2 MPa in summer and decreased to a mean of -3.8 MPa in midwinter. The decline involved dehydration, and to a lesser extent, osmoregulation. At decreased Ψtact values (<3.0 MPa), supercooling capacity significantly increased <-19.5 °C, however, the correlation between actual water potential and supercooling capacity was poor. Frost-hardening treatments increased the supercooling capacity of bud primordia (-0.6 K day-1) and lowered Ψtact (-0.2 MPa day-1). Frost-dehardening treatments reduced supercooling capacity (+1.1 K day-1), and at the same time, increased Ψtact (+0.3 MPa day-1). In contrast, artificial drying of bud primordia in the range observed seasonally (-2.0 MPa) had no effect on supercooling capacity. These results suggest that there is no causal relationship between desiccation and the supercooling capacity of bud primordia in P. abies, but rather it involves other compounds within the cells of the bud primordium that reduce the water potential.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureDesiccationPiceaPlant LeavesSeasonsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID29182788
PMCPMC5895075
OpenAlexW2769494268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.