Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182641›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Treatment eligibility and retention in clinical HIV care: A regression discontinuity study in South Africa.

Jacob Bor, Matthew P Fox, Sydney Rosen, Atheendar Venkataramani, Frank Tanser, Deenan Pillay, Till Bärnighausen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jacob BorDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Matthew P FoxDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9887-0634
Sydney RosenDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-2964
Atheendar VenkataramaniDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-8903
Frank TanserAfrica Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa.
Deenan PillayAfrica Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-244X
Till BärnighausenAfrica Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa.
Boston University · USAfrica Health Research Institute · ZACentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training Tanzanian Researchers for HIV/AIDS Implementation ScienceD43TW009775 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, Christopher Sudfeld · 2015 to 2026
$3.0M
New Methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventionsR01AI112339 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
Causal Pathways to population health impact of HIV antiretroviral treatmentR01HD084233 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2015 to 2021
$2.3M
Can HIV Hot-Spots be eradicated? An intervention to decrease HIV transmission to young women in rural KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaR01AI124389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Analysis of National Lab Database to evaluate the HIV treatment rollout in South AfricaR01AI115979 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI FOX, MATTHEW ALEXANDER PEASE, MASKEW, MHAIRI · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Microenterprise to Improve Child Development in Households Exposed to HIVK23MH106362 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VENKATARAMANI, ATHEENDAR S. · 2015 to 2018
$738k
Economic, health, and behavioral dimensions of HIV treatment scale-upK01MH105320 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOR, JACOB · 2015 to 2018
$613k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009775NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112339NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI115979NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI124389NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084233NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH105320NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH106362Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss to follow-up is high among HIV patients not yet receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of early ART; however, these trials may miss an important real-world consequence of providing ART at diagnosis: its impact on retention in care. METHODS AND

findingsWe examined the effect of immediate (versus deferred) ART on retention in care using a regression discontinuity design. The analysis included all patients (N = 11,306) entering clinical HIV care with a first CD4 count between 12 August 2011 and 31 December 2012 in a public-sector HIV care and treatment program in rural South Africa. Patients were assigned to immediate versus deferred ART eligibility, as determined by a CD4 count < 350 cells/μl, per South African national guidelines. Patients referred to pre-ART care were instructed to return every 6 months for CD4 monitoring. Patients initiated on ART were instructed to return at 6 and 12 months post-initiation and annually thereafter for CD4 and viral load monitoring. We assessed retention in HIV care at 12 months, as measured by the presence of a clinic visit, lab test, or ART initiation 6 to 18 months after initial CD4 test. Differences in retention between patients presenting with CD4 counts just above versus just below the 350-cells/μl threshold were estimated using local linear regression models with a data-driven bandwidth and with the algorithm for selecting the bandwidth chosen ex ante. Among patients with CD4 counts close to the 350-cells/μl threshold, having an ART-eligible CD4 count (<350 cells/μl) was associated with higher 12-month retention than not having an ART-eligible CD4 count (50% versus 32%), an intention-to-treat risk difference of 18 percentage points (95% CI 11 to 23; p < 0.001). The decision to start ART was determined by CD4 count for one in four patients (25%) presenting close to the eligibility threshold (95% CI 20% to 31%; p < 0.001). In this subpopulation, having an ART-eligible CD4 count was associated with higher 12-month retention than not having an ART-eligible CD4 count (91% versus 21%), a complier causal risk difference of 70 percentage points (95% CI 42 to 98; p < 0.001). The major limitations of the study are the potential for limited generalizability, the potential for outcome misclassification, and the absence of data on longer-term health outcomes.

conclusionsPatients who were eligible for immediate ART had dramatically higher retention in HIV care than patients who just missed the CD4-count eligibility cutoff. The clinical and population health benefits of offering immediate ART regardless of CD4 count may be larger than suggested by clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePublic SectorRural PopulationSouth AfricaTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment OutcomeViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29182641
PMCPMC5705070
OpenAlexW2768189035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.