Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182569›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Knee Impedance Modulation to Control an Active Orthosis Using Insole Sensors.

Ana Cecilia Villa-Parra, Denis Delisle-Rodriguez, Jessica Souza Lima, Anselmo Frizera-Neto, Teodiano Bastos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of stance controlFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Atypical Gait Cycles in Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Assistance Robotics and Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Cecilia Villa-ParraPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil. acvillap@ieee.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7588-9372
Denis Delisle-RodriguezPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil. delisle05@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-031X
Jessica Souza LimaPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitoria 29043-900, Brazil. jpaola.fisio@gmail.com.
Anselmo Frizera-NetoPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil. frizera@ieee.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-3967
Teodiano BastosPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil. teodiano.bastos@ufes.br.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRPolitecnica Salesiana University · ECUniversidad de Oriente · CU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic devices for rehabilitation and gait assistance have greatly advanced with the objective of improving both the mobility and quality of life of people with motion impairments. To encourage active participation of the user, the use of admittance control strategy is one of the most appropriate approaches, which requires methods for online adjustment of impedance components. Such approach is cited by the literature as a challenge to guaranteeing a suitable dynamic performance. This work proposes a method for online knee impedance modulation, which generates variable gains through the gait cycle according to the users' anthropometric data and gait sub-phases recognized with footswitch signals. This approach was evaluated in an active knee orthosis with three variable gain patterns to obtain a suitable condition to implement a stance controller: two different gain patterns to support the knee in stance phase, and a third pattern for gait without knee support. The knee angle and torque were measured during the experimental protocol to compare both temporospatial parameters and kinematics data with other studies of gait with knee exoskeletons. The users rated scores related to their satisfaction with both the device and controller through QUEST questionnaires. Experimental results showed that the admittance controller proposed here offered knee support in 50% of the gait cycle, and the walking speed was not significantly different between the three gain patterns (

Indexed as

active knee orthosisadmitance controlfootswitchgait cycleknee impedance

Identifiers

PMID29182569
PMCPMC5750722
OpenAlexW2770518097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.